Maria Butina: The Spy Who Said Too Much, Analysis of the James Bamford Audio Tapes

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC – Exclusive new video published to social media on February 13, 2019, explores seemingly indicting granular audio reflections from tapes of best-selling U.S. national intelligence author James Bamford’s interviews with confessed unregistered Russian foreign agent Maria Butina. Outtakes from these recordings were released earlier this week by CNN. On that same day an article published in The New Republic offered the sympathetic portrait of pro-gun rights Right to Bear Arms’ founder as an American University graduate swept up in the “Trump-Russia maelstrom”.  However, none of these arguments explain the manner in which the new video shows Maria Butina appearing to cite an “enemy” in sleep talking–like encrypted narrative while describing her arrest by the FBI.

Russian activist Maria Butina was arrested by agents of the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation in Washington, D.C., last summer where she was charged with acting as an agent of a foreign government absent prior notice to the U.S. Attorney General. Held in solitary confinement the Siberian native gave in December what Russia’s Foreign Ministry described as a false forced confession pleading guilty to conspiracy.

Author James Bamford’s 1982 book “The Puzzle Palace: Inside the National Security Agency, America’s Most Secret Intelligence Organization” exposed a 1976 Justice Department criminal investigation into massive illegal domestic NSA wiretapping, a nightmare that re-emerged into public consciousness during the George W. Bush administration’s surge in “Top Secret America” economics at the beginning of this century.

The Emmy-nominated journalist told The New Republic how he met with Maria Butina over a number of lunches earlier last year where he commenced a series of interviews that continued after her arrest. Outtakes from taped interviews that were released by CNN showed the accused protesting her innocence.

Earlier NewsInsideOut.com coverage of events surrounding Maria Butina investigated her videotaped appearance at 2015 FreedomFest where an unforced sleep talking-like confession disclosing status as a Russian spy was revealed via granular audio analysis of spontaneous on-camera remarks. Previous granular audio work by this reporter identified a Russian spy in the 2010 Anna Chapman “Illegals Program” whose name was published in the Wall Street Journal nine months later.

The aura of certitude that accompanies the following reporting is founded in this writer’s historic international public legacy exceeding industry standards of performance and reliability in forwards-looking counterintelligence investigative journalism. The following is a transcript of outtakes provided by CNN of James Bamford’s Maria Butina interview tapes. Multidimensional speech messages are indicated in bold followed by the context in which they were discovered. Granular audio methods are discussed later in this article.

We need surrender. We have struggled. Believe the lie: If I would be invisible Russian spy, you would never see me in public. I would be the most unseen person on Earth.

There’s an enemy: I had just cleaned my apartment and I was baking banana bread. They told me “FBI, search warrant” so I opened the door. They just walked in the door. I was pushed back.

Interpreting these messages invites the observer to consider the role of ideology and ideological indoctrination in the behaviors of Maria Butina. In the first instance this speaker appears engaged with a struggle related to identity insomuch as she outwardly denies being a spy while secretly commanding compliance with a narrative in which Maria Butina appears to have little faith.

The notion of struggle is itself central to Marxist ideology found in discussions of class struggle and the struggle of the proletariat labor class vs the bourgeoisies. This begs the question if a Russian spy would show indications of intensive Communist indoctrination such as those revealed in this study focussed upon Maria Butina, any more so than an average Russian citizen.

In sharp contrast to the U.S.-Russian friendship mission cited by Maria Butina in reports linked above, the speaker appears in the second instance to recognize an adversarial force when discussing how representatives of the federal government arrested her. A 2018 NewsInsideOut.com report investigating police bodycam footage of YouTube shooter Nasim Aghdam revealed her assertion of “militia” status during a public safety check conducted by officers at a Walmart parking lot in Silicon Valley.

Would a Russian intelligence old-guard ideologue construe representatives of the United States government as “enemy” personnel any more so than the average Russian citizen studying in a foreign country?

In this reporter’s opinion Maria Butina is the spy who said too much. If James Bamford had intended to further shield her reputation he would have been well-advised to never allow these tapes to enter the public record in a widely-publicized journalistic climate where digital audio workstations shred false testimony for days.

Methods

Research that exposed human speech as a “multidimensional stimulus” with “numerous ways you can extract a message from it” was reported in the scientific journal Nature in 1999. In that report human observers were described as competent in resolving words while listening to highly-distorted speech recording samples. The procedure followed by scientists at Cal State involved digitally sampling recordings of human speech where samples were then reduced to grains of @50ms in duration.

Those grains were then locally time-reversed and globally resequenced in an attempt to emulate conditions found in voice-over-digital-network transmission (now commonly referred to as VoIP telephony). This methodology parallels techniques commonly used in biosciences where the nucleotides (grains) of a DNA molecule (sample) are resequenced in attempts to express novel characteristics of existing organisms (or to synthesize entirely new organisms from existing genetic materials).

For every set of discrete items the number of possible permutations of its order or sequence can be determined by using what is known as the factorial function (n!) where for example 3! = 3 x 2 x 1 = 6. In terms of granular speech synthesis the number of 50ms grains can be substantial, leading to what mathematicians call large numbers. For example, calculating the number of possible permutations of a set of 21 50ms grains by factorial function can be said to result in approximately 51 sextillion different sequences (5.1090942e+19).

However, for every set of discrete items (no matter how many), it can also be said that one possible permutation will always reflect the mirror or reverse order of the original sequence. In such a way (1, 2, 3) is newly rendered as (3, 2, 1). This understanding offers a shortcut of which common knowledge within the scientific and engineering communities is indicated by the inclusion of reverse macro functions in widely-used digital audio workstation (DAW) software applications and hardware. Investigators following the sampling, granular time-reversing and resequencing procedure modeled by scientists studying human speech intelligibility at Cal State can bypass untold iterations and simply monitor audio playback in reverse or mirror order with one click of a cursor.

From this reporter’s perspective the most important reason for bypassing myriad alternative sequence iterations is founded upon empirical evidence of practical intelligence discovered encrypted backwards in human speech. In the public domain this intelligence has offered preemptive understanding of facts concerning the Iraq War, the identity of one serial killer, the identity of a Russian spy and the resurrection of a CIA assassination program all named in broadcast media and online publications sometimes years before they were substantiated by mainstream news reports. Some of these reports are detailed in links provided below.

However, within modern society there remain numerous deeply ingrained superstitious implications of such encrypted multidimensional speech phenomena. These perceptions can be said founded upon dogmatic unscientific belief in fictitious untestable unproven entities and their supposed influences upon human behavior. Proponents of such scandalous misconceptions would stir the public to reject any suggestion of a time wheel’s (Sanskrit “Kalachakra”) bi-directional rotation, for instance. It is this type of Luddite perspective that would discourage the use of an automobile transmission’s reverse gear, compelling motorists to circumnavigate the globe instead of simply backing into a parking spot.

Therefore, only those capable of rejecting medieval injunctions against widdershins procession can embrace the type of volatile materials revealed through such a path of auditory inquiry. To quote one prominent Seattle psychologist this extremely psychoactive procedure and its findings are “not for beginners”.

Recommended Reading

‘She’s a Spy’: Alleged Russian Operative Maria Butina Disclosed Secret Agent Status at 2015 FreedomFest

Anna Chapman’s secret messages named youth accomplice, anticipated handler’s betrayal

Was YouTube Shooting a Terrorist Attack? Police Video ‘Militia’ Secret Suggests Nasim Aghdam Accomplices

‘Sex with Daddy’: Helsinki Secret Messages Confirm Trump a Putin Proxy

‘Lie for Russia’: President Trump Kompromat, evidence encrypted in statements to CIA

ANALYSIS: Secret Messages Confirm Sexual Assault in Christine Blasey Ford Testimony, Suggest Brett Kavanaugh Allegations Factual

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC – Exclusive new video published to social media on September 28, 2018, explores multidimensional facets of Senate Judiciary Committee testimony from Stanford University School of Medicine research psychologist Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. Granular audio analysis appears to partially confirm this Palo Alto University professor’s allegations she was sexually assaulted during a high school party in 1982. U.S. President Donald Trump called Dr. Ford a credible witness and has now directed the Federal Bureau of Investigation to conduct a supplemental background check of controversial United States Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, named by Dr. Ford as one of her alleged attackers. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is said to be encouraged “by the number of women coming forward to call out sexual misconduct” in MeToo America.

“Speech is a multidimensional stimulus” with “numerous ways you can extract a message from it,” explains Dr. Kourosh Saberi, Professor at the University of California, Irvine School of Social Sciences. Dr. Saberi coauthored research (reported by the journal Nature in 1999) using granular synthesis methods that time-reversed and resequenced human speech to test for intelligibility under conditions simulating transmission of audio signals over digital networks. This research informed now-widely implemented Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephony and was headlined by the Associated Press as “Human Brain Understands Backwards Speech”.

This reporter’s expert independent study replicated the granular audio synthesis methods used by scientific researchers (including sampling, granular time-reversal and resequencing) in an attempt to detect sleep talking-like unconscious messages reflected in the spoken word testimony of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford during her appearance before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday. The study was not in vain and in fact did detect traces of what appear to be a survivor’s disclosures of sexual assault at the hands of one or more men, substantiating public testimony of the witness.

The following results highlight these findings in bold followed by transcripts of the statements from which they were derived. Expert commentary is embedded between each of the results.

Saw that. Speaks it: I remember being on the street and feeling an enormous sense of relief that I had escaped from the house and that Brett and Mark were not coming after me. Brett’s assault on me drastically altered my life. For a very long time, I was too afraid and ashamed to tell anyone the details. I did not want to tell my parents that I, at age 15, was in a house without any parents present, drinking beer with boys.

Comment: This message appears to amplify Dr. Ford’s remarks, expressing how what she witnessed in the past is what was described during her appearance before the Senate Judicial Committee. It seems to be telling us that she saw those events of which she spoke at that time.

I saw this. Know what I am. 2) Heal victim. 3) He wounded. That knife. Had to have it. 4) You had a block. An exam: The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had completed an extensive remodel of our home, and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand. In explaining why I wanted to have a second front door, I described the assault in detail. I recall saying that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S. Supreme Court and spoke a bit about his background. My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh.

Comment: The speaker becomes verbose expressing a burst of multiple messages during this part of her statement. The first message emphasizes standing as a witness while validating cognition of her identity. This is followed by a call for relief directed towards a perceived injured party, as if such a party did exist in this case. The messages then describe a past injury occurring due to the actions of a male perpetrator.

The instrument used to cause injury is described as a knife. During her testimony Dr. Ford stated that a then-teenage Judge Kavanaugh began “grinding his hips into me” suggesting the possibility she was able to feel his erect genital organ. The phallus as an instrument of assault is here rendered by the speaker as a dangerously sharp pointed and bladed symbolic weapon capable of causing injury.

In the language of symbols this weaponized attribution can describe male fertility and sexual arousal whose outcome leads to death. Use of such symbolism further equates rape as an expression of human sacrifice. Insistence of perpetrators intent upon obtaining a trophy in sexual conquest is emphasized by the final part of the message. Sequential references to a block and an exam are consistent with Dr. Ford’s testimony in which she told the committee “I struggled academically” both immediately after the alleged assault and during college.

Penis shoves. He’s very close. 2) Law save us. You remember. Their own use. Abandoned you:  After that May 2012 therapy session, I did my best to suppress memories of the assault because recounting the details caused me to relive the experience, and caused panic attacks and anxiety. Occasionally I would discuss the assault in individual therapy, but talking about it caused me to relive the trauma, so I tried not to think about it or discuss it.

Comment: Here the symbolic phallus from earlier is now revealed as the male reproductive organ asserted by “grinding” where the sense of proximity is highlighted as well. By closeness the speaker may be describing physical proximity (“on top of me”) during a course of violent activities perceived as leading to sexual penetration and male orgasm during which Dr. Ford feared for her life. Opening remarks emphasized “I thought that Brett was accidentally going to kill me.”

An appeal to justice suggests Dr. Ford’s fundamental belief in the system of laws represented by the Supreme Court emphasized in her citation of civic duty as a key reason for her appearance before the committee. Affirming her recollection the messages goes on to cite feelings of exploitation and isolation, aligned with testimony stating “Both Brett and Mark were drunkenly laughing during the attack. They both seemed to be having a good time. Mark was urging Brett on, although at times he told Brett to stop. A couple of times I made eye contact with Mark and thought he might try to help me, but he did not.”

They rape her: But over the years, I went through periods where I thought about Brett’s attack. I confided in some close friends that I had an experience with sexual assault. Occasionally I stated that my assailant was a prominent lawyer or judge but I did not use his name. I do not recall each person I spoke to about Brett’s assault, and some friends have reminded me of these conversations since the publication of The Washington Post story on September 16, 2018.

Comment: Use of infinitive here suggests an incident that perpetuates in the mind of the victim long after the alleged assault is over. While Dr. Ford does not claim to be have been physically penetrated, her feelings of diminished personhood and psychological injury can be understood as consequences of trespasses of personal boundaries resulting from a non-consensual physical attack. It seems that during the reported incident Dr. Ford perceived intent to rape and that she was confronted by perpetrators who had already raped her in their minds.

Citations of terror offered to the committee also suggested Dr. Ford’s concerns that her appearance Thursday to discuss these allegations could potentially (and already had in the public sphere) serve to further abuse resulting in the social and psychological rape of her reputation and personhood. “I am here today not because I want to be. I am terrified. I am here because I believe it is my civic duty to tell you what happened to me while Brett Kavanaugh and I were in high school,” Dr. Ford stated in opening remarks.

My nerve. I’m damaged. 2) He rapes. The death bar. 3) The man broke me. 4) Give us some soda: But until July 2018, I had never named Mr. Kavanaugh as my attacker outside of therapy. This all changed in early July 2018. I saw press reports stating that Brett Kavanaugh was on the “short list” of potential Supreme Court nominees. I thought it was my civic duty to relay the information I had about Mr. Kavanaugh’s conduct so that those considering his potential nomination would know about this assault.

Comment: Dr. Ford’s fragility was evident in her presentation and testimony where for example she claimed to have insisted against her husband’s wishes on renovating the Ford family home to include two front doors as a means of alleviating apparent lifelong feelings of claustrophobia resulting from the reported assault.

Rape again appears in the infinitive ascribed to a male assailant within a near-fatal context consistent with witness testimony. The words “death” and “bar” are paired together in sequence. Psychological implications of a reported sexual assault’s aftermath are here expressed in a phallic way that alludes to the male organ’s geometry in terms of language common to both alcohol dispensaries and legal institutions of which the alleged assailant is a highly visible consumer, a member and nominee.

The notion of ruptured identity as consequence of a male perpetrator’s crimes against a minor is here expressed using language also found in testimony ascribed to another victim who survived severe sexual and physical abuse proven in a court of law. In a recent report published by People an anonymous survivor of New Mexico’s Aggressive Christianity Missions Training Corps was said to have explained how “Emotionally, she broke me as a child to the point where I still today struggle with my own self-confidence, my self-esteem, my sense of worth.” Based upon such testimony founding leader Deborah Greene was sentenced to 72 years in prison by a Thirteenth Judicial District Court judge.

The final reference to soda is consistent with the large bottle of Coca Cola from which Dr. Ford poured soda into her glass during Thursday’s appearance before the committee. This reference appears to bring the content of her messages into compliance with then-present-time events during which she accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Parallelism with present events gives rise to the suggestion that the otherwise unnamed 1982 male rapist described in her messages may have indeed been the accused nominee of today.

Recommended Reading

‘She’s a Spy’: Alleged Russian Operative Maria Butina Disclosed Secret Agent Status at 2015 FreedomFest

‘Sex with Daddy’: Helsinki Secret Messages Confirm Trump a Putin Proxy

Behind the yellow mask: Trump spills urophile secrets at ‘Watersportsgate’ presser

‘Lie for Russia’: President Trump Kompromat, evidence encrypted in statements to CIA

Anna Chapman’s secret messages named youth accomplice, anticipated handler’s betrayal

‘She’s a Spy’: Alleged Russian Operative Maria Butina Disclosed Secret Agent Status at 2015 FreedomFest

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC – Exclusive TrueTube by NewsInsideOut.com video published July 18, 2018, exposes the unconscious confession of alleged Russian spy Maria Butina. Granular analysis of the soundtrack from an on camera interview recorded at FreedomFest 2015 in Las Vegas, Nevada, reveals the suspect’s sleep talking-like disclosure encrypted within a resequenced time-reversed audio sample. The U.S. Department of Justice was said to have charged the gun rights organizer with felony conspiracy in Washington D.C. on Monday, the day of the 2018 Russia-United States summit in Helsinki, Finland. Press reports link Maria Butina to the National Rifle Association, the Republican Party and the 2016 Trump Campaign.

UPDATE: On December 13, 2018, Russian citizen Maria Butina pleaded guilty in federal court to conspiring to influence U.S. politics through her connections to the National Rifle Association. NewsInsideOut.com’s independent investigation identified the Russian secret agent status of Maria Butina in this article published six months earlier. 2011 coverage by this reporter named Anna Chapman’s youth accomplice in the Russian “Illegals Program” case. The Wall Street Journal confirmed citing official sources nine months later.

The U.S. president spoke at FreedomFest 2015 offering his perspectives on Russian-U.S. relations at the dawn of his campaign where he explained “I know Putin. And I tell you what. We get along with Putin. Putin has no respect for President Obama. Big problem. Big problem. And Russia has been driven. You know, I’ve always heard, for years I’ve heard, one of the worst things that can happen to our country is if Russia ever gets driven to China.”

“I believe I would get along very nicely with Putin,” the president continued, “Okay? And I mean, where we have the strength.”

The New York Times Wednesday described how “President Trump appeared to say on Wednesday that Russia was no longer targeting the United States, contradicting his own intelligence chief just a day after promising that his administration was working to prevent Kremlin interference in the upcoming midterm elections. “Hours later,” the report went on to say, “The White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, said that Mr. Trump was answering a different question, and that “we believe the threat still exists.””

In a separate news brief Reuters claimed “U.S. intelligence officials have said Russia’s efforts to undermine elections are continuing and now target the Nov. 6 congressional elections.” In court documents the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation was said to elaborate further how “Moscow seeks to create wedges that reduce trust and confidence in democratic processes, degrade democratization efforts, weaken US partnerships with European allies, undermine Western sanctions, encourage anti-US political views, and counter efforts to bring Ukraine and other former Soviet states into European institutions.”

In charges filed Wednesday prosecutors described a “Red Sparrow” (2018) scenario in which 29 year-old suspect Maria Butina is alleged to have attempted to trade sex for influence.

NewsInsideOut.com has previously discussed an historic 2011 report that identified Russian SVR “Illegals Program” youth operative Tim Foley when his name appeared in granular audio analysis of Anna Chapman’s on camera interview at a New York human resources convention. Anna Chapman pleaded guilty in 2010 to conspiracy to act as an agent of a foreign government without notifying the U.S. Attorney General in a case resembling Maria Butina’s. In 2012 the Wall Street Journal confirmed Tim Foley’s identity nine months after “Tim” was first named as an accomplice to a “Vegas drop”.

NewsInsideOut.com coverage of Monday’s 2018 Russia-United States summit in Helsinki, Finland, considered how the U.S. President exhibited behaviors of a paternal incest survivor. According to granular analysis of his statements at that day’s press conference, the president was heard to pass sleep talking-like comments regarding “dildos” and “sex with daddy.” A report that appeared the following day on a local NYC website featured a July 17, 2018, photograph of a bare-chested Putin imitator astride the Wall Street Bull where the bronze tourist attraction is shown covered in dildos.

One possible interpretation of these overnight events suggests domestic intelligence insiders familiar with the president’s exposure weaponized that art display in a Kompromat dog whistle PSYOP.

Speech is a multidimensional stimulus where granular analysis can resequence locally time-reversed grains of speech to synthesize new meaning from digital reflections of the audio soundtrack. A series of NewsInsideOut.com reports (see links below) have described how this approach successfully determined facts of global wars, serial killer identities as well as Russian, Israeli and U.S. intelligence operations days, weeks, months and years before they were accepted as mainstream knowledge.

Below is a partial transcript of the secret message heard in the video ‘’’She’s a Spy’: Maria Butina Disclosed Russian Agent Status at FreedomFest 2015” where a message from a July 2015 conference video is indicated in bold followed by the context in which it was discovered.

She’s a spy: In Russia I’m the founder and now I’m a board member of the Right to Bear Arms. This is an all-Russian public organization. We promote gun rights. I made this trip because I think that freedom is very important and basic of any freedom is of course gun rights, economy. And I would like to know more and bring this knowledge to Russia. I’m travelling from Moscow, from Russia. And I hope it will be useful to my country.

According to one source “FreedomFest is an annual festival where free minds meet to celebrate “great books, great ideas, and great thinkers” in an open-minded society.  It is independent, non-partisan, and not affiliated with any organization or think tank.  Founded and produced by Mark Skousen since 2002, FreedomFest invites the “best and the brightest” from around the world to talk, strategize, socialize, and celebrate liberty. FreedomFest is open to all and is purely egalitarian, where speakers, attendees, and exhibitors are treated as equals.”

Recommended Reading

Anna Chapman’s secret messages named youth accomplice, anticipated handler’s betrayal

‘Sex with Daddy’: Helsinki Secret Messages Confirm Trump a Putin Proxy

Behind the yellow mask: Trump spills urophile secrets at ‘Watersportsgate’ presser

‘Lie for Russia’: President Trump Kompromat, evidence encrypted in statements to CIA

Fenton Files: Helsinki Peace, Exposing Cold War Spies with Guest Jon Kelly

Fenton Files: Helsinki Peace, Exposing Cold War Spies with Guest Jon Kelly

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Fenton Files with Jon Kelly

Vancouver, BC – Earlier this week NewsInsideOut.com’s Jon Kelly offered his reflections on Monday’s 2018 Russia-United States summit in Helsinki, Finland, from the perspective of a veteran investigative reporter who exposed the name of a Russian “Illegals Program” youth operative nine months before it was published in the Wall Street Journal. Host Lorien Fenton from KCOR’s The Fenton Files explored cognitive recalibration in the digital era with guest Jon Kelly including a rare public examination of nine audio permutations of the 2001 George W. Bush Inaugural Address during the July 9, 2018, broadcast.

CLICK HERE TO LISTEN

In a background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections” published January 6, 2017, by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) the U.S. Intelligence Community cited the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) “Illegals Program” for their role in reporting to Moscow about the 2008 U.S. presidential election. The most publicly visible of the “Illegals Program” spies is Anna Chapman whose involuntary disclosure identifying youth accomplice Tim Foley was published by this reporter nine months before a story in the Wall Street Journal confirmed that name.

The DNI background stated “Since the Cold War, Russian intelligence efforts related to US elections have primarily focused on foreign intelligence collection. For decades, Russian and Soviet intelligence services have sought to collect insider information from US political parties that could help Russian leaders understand a new US administration’s plans and priorities.”

Topmost in a list of bullet points the document highlighted “The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) Directorate S (Illegals) officers arrested in the United States in 2010 reported to Moscow about the 2008 election.”

During the Fenton Files interview former CBS Radio feature producer Jon Kelly suggested Cold War legacy dynamics still at play in 2018 citing Russian spies residing in the U.S. as recently as 2010.

“The answer has to be yes,” he affirmed. “The “Illegals Program” story is only eight years old. It’s still part of that dynamic. We can’t ignore that it’s going on.”

Turning to Monday’s 2018 Russia-United States summit the independent clinical analyst reflected “Whatever hopes for diplomacy that we are upholding (where President Trump has a meeting with President Putin) there’s hope for global peace riding on those meetings too.”

However, the veteran investigative reporter cautioned “We can’t ignore the hope for peace, but at the same time let’s not have too rosey-tinted an approach to these questions. Obviously there are spy operations as recent as the 2010 “Illegals Program”.”

Supplementary Videos

Recommended Reading

Message to Kim: Character Trumps Nukes and Spies in Global Leadership Race with Jon Kelly on End of Days: The Michael Decon Program

Future is Granular: Cognitive Recalibration in the Digital Era with Jon Kelly on Late Night in the Midlands

Revived CIA Phoenix assassination program reported three years before Snowden’s Intercept: Maidan Conspiracy Redux (British black ops in Kiev sniper attacks)

Anna Chapman’s secret messages named youth accomplice, anticipated handler’s betrayal

Mossad named in Brussels attacks according to new analysis of second witness to Zaventem airport explosions testimony