Michael Avenatti Arrest: Secret Messages Suggest Paternity Dispute Played Role in Alleged Domestic Violence

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC – Exclusive new video published to social media on November 14, 2018, examines the multidimensional speech of potential U.S. presidential candidate Michael Avenatti. The prominent Los Angeles attorney was arrested today after police received a domestic violence call from an as-yet unnamed plaintiff. Findings of the video’s granular audio analysis-based preliminary investigation suggest high-profile legal commentator Michael John Avenatti and a female plaintiff engaged in a dispute like one contesting paternity and pregnancy issues within the time frame when the alleged incident occurred. The attorney representing adult film star Stormy Daniels was arrested today on suspicion of domestic violence and released from custody on a reported $50,000 bail whereupon he spoke briefly to the press late this afternoon and welcomed a full investigation.

Statement of Michael Avenatti

UPDATE: CBS News reported on November 21, 2018, “The Los Angeles district attorney declined to prosecute attorney Michael Avenatti on felony domestic abuse charges on Wednesday and referred allegations that he roughed up his girlfriend to the city attorney for a possible misdemeanor case.” In a statement shared on Twitter the Los Angeles attorney wrote “This Thanksgiving, I am especially grateful for justice.”

Michael Avenatti is now the second outspoken critic of U.S. President Donald Trump cited for inappropriate conduct involving a woman this month after Press Secretary Sarah Sanders propagated what the Associated Press called a doctored video showing Cable News Network (CNN) White House correspondent Jim Acosta supposedly karate-chopping an intern last Wednesday (watch NewsInsideOut.com’s breakdown of this incident here). With the backing of Fox News and USA Today CNN is now suing President Trump along with top aides accusing them of violating the U.S. Constitution’s guarantee of freedom of the press.

In such a climate it is not inconceivable that Michael Avenatti has become only the latest target for political retribution in a wide-ranging White House smear campaign that resorts to deep fake videos and fake news to silence top media-supported political opponents of the current administration. Findings from the NewsInsideOut.com preliminary investigation suggest a worst-case scenario in which an unnamed plaintiff struck the legal commentator whereupon he pushed her away in self-defense.

UPDATE:

In a comment posted to Twitter on November 14, 2018, Surefire Intelligence has claimed involvement in the arrest of Los Angeles attorney Michael Avenatti. Surefire is reportedly linked via domain and telephone records to provocateur Jacob Wohl who gained notoriety last month for his involvement in a failed plot to accuse special counsel Robert Mueller of sexual misconduct. The former hedge fund manager is reportedly banned for life from futures trading after defrauding investors in 2016. A representative for Mueller said the “claims that women had been offered money for their accusations against him were referred to law enforcement.”

Below are the remarks of Michael Avenatti upon his release after posting bail recorded this afternoon (Source: “BREAKING: Michael Avenatti speaks after arrest of alleged domestic violence (FNN)“ Fox 10 Phoenix).  Those comments were subjected to granular audio analysis with results presented below where secret sleep talking-like messages encrypted backwards in the Los Angeles attorney’s statements are indicated in bold. Granular audio methods and their implications are discussed later in this article.

Muscle. Shoved her. ‘Fraid of baby. They lied: First of all I want to thank the hard-working men and women of the L.A.P.D. for their professional ism in their work today. They had no option in light of the allegations. Secondly, I have never struck a woman. I never will strike a woman. I have been an advocate for women’s rights my entire career and I’m going to continue to be an advocate. I am not going to be intimidated from stopping what I am doing.

Her strike: I am a father to two beautiful smart daughters. I would never disrespect them by touching a woman inappropriately or striking a woman. I am looking forward to a full investigation at which point I am confident that I will be fully exonerated. I also want to thank everyone for their support that has reached out. You know my character. You know me as a man and I appreciate it. Thank you.

Based upon these findings it is conceivable that during a dispute like one surrounding claims of pregnancy and paternity the plaintiff struck Michael Avenatti who then shoved her away in self-defense. Such issues surrounding paternity may have been relevant to the present circumstances or may have occurred in the past where memories of unresolved trauma that could potentially be traced to the attorney’s family of origin were reinvigorated during an argument with someone the professional race car driver cared deeply about.

At such a moment of crisis and a tipping point for his public profile, Michael Avenatti appears unable to summon the ferocious unconscious intensity discovered in related studies of convicted predators including Bill Cosby, Dennis Rader (BTK Killer), John Wayne Gacy and ISIS terrorist Abu Turaab Al-Kanadi (see links to articles below). The milder qualities of today’s secret messages discovered in this preliminary investigation appear to differentiate the accused in a way that suggests a person of better character.

NewsInsideOut.com cautiously awaits the results of a full police investigation along with the decision of the courts in identify the facts of today’s potentially politically-motivated allegations. A New York Times report published weeks earlier commemorated October as Domestic Violence Awareness Month in the MeToo era, exploring “why the conversation around domestic violence differs from sexual assault and what would need to change for domestic violence to have its own cultural reckoning.”

Methods

Research that exposed human speech as a “multidimensional stimulus” with “numerous ways you can extract a message from it” was reported in the scientific journal Nature in 1999. In that report human observers were described as competent in resolving words while listening to highly-distorted speech recording samples. The procedure followed by scientists at Cal State involved digitally sampling recordings of human speech where samples were then reduced to grains of @50ms in duration.

Those grains were then locally time-reversed and globally resequenced in an attempt to emulate conditions found in voice-over-digital-network transmission (now commonly referred to as VoIP telephony). This methodology parallels techniques commonly used in biosciences where the nucleotides (grains) of a DNA molecule (sample) are resequenced in attempts to express novel characteristics of existing organisms (or to synthesize entirely new organisms from existing genetic materials).

For every set of discrete items the number of possible permutations of its order or sequence can be determined by using what is known as the factorial function (n!) where for example 3! = 3 x 2 x 1 = 6. In terms of granular speech synthesis the number of 50ms grains can be substantial, leading to what mathematicians call large numbers. For example, calculating the number of possible permutations of a set of 21 50ms grains by factorial function can be said to result in approximately 51 sextillion different sequences (5.1090942e+19).

However, for every set of discrete items (no matter how many), it can also be said that one possible permutation will always reflect the mirror or reverse order of the original sequence. In such a way (1, 2, 3) is newly rendered as (3, 2, 1). This understanding offers a shortcut of which common knowledge within the scientific and engineering communities is indicated by the inclusion of reverse macro functions in widely-used digital audio workstation (DAW) software applications and hardware. Investigators following the sampling, granular time-reversing and resequencing procedure modeled by scientists studying human speech intelligibility at Cal State can bypass untold iterations and simply monitor audio playback in reverse or mirror order with one click of a cursor.

From this reporter’s perspective the most important reason for bypassing myriad alternative sequence iterations is founded upon empirical evidence of practical intelligence discovered encrypted backwards in human speech. In the public domain this intelligence has offered preemptive understanding of facts concerning the Iraq War, the identity of one serial killer, the identity of a Russian spy and the resurrection of a CIA assassination program all named in broadcast media and online publications sometimes years before they were substantiated by mainstream news reports. Some of these reports are detailed in links provided below.

However, within modern society there remain numerous deeply ingrained superstitious implications of such encrypted multidimensional speech phenomena. These perceptions can be said founded upon dogmatic unscientific belief in fictitious untestable unproven entities and their supposed influences upon human behavior. Proponents of such scandalous misconceptions would stir the public to reject any suggestion of a time wheel’s (Sanskrit “Kalachakra”) bi-directional rotation, for instance. It is this type of Luddite perspective that would discourage the use of an automobile transmission’s reverse gear, compelling motorists to circumnavigate the globe instead of simply backing into a parking spot.

Therefore, only those capable of rejecting medieval injunctions against widdershins procession can embrace the type of volatile materials revealed through such a path of auditory inquiry. To quote one prominent Seattle psychologist this extremely psychoactive procedure and its findings are “not for beginners”.

Recommended Reading

Bill Cosby’s secret messages disclosed MKULTRA ‘Rape Demon’ redux

Future is Granular: Cognitive Recalibration in the Digital Era with Jon Kelly on Late Night in the Midlands

Pizzagate’s Killer Klown: John Wayne Gacy described stabbing, dismemberment and possible location of missing victim in 1969

Pipe Bomb PSYOP Suspect Cesar Sayoc Advertised POTUS Hero Worship According to Secret Messages

Interrogating ISIS: Abu Turaab Al-Kanadi Secret Messages Expose Suspected Role in Execution by Hanging, ‘Family Guy’ Mass Media Social Conditioning

ANALYSIS: Secret Messages Confirm Sexual Assault in Christine Blasey Ford Testimony, Suggest Brett Kavanaugh Allegations Factual

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC – Exclusive new video published to social media on September 28, 2018, explores multidimensional facets of Senate Judiciary Committee testimony from Stanford University School of Medicine research psychologist Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. Granular audio analysis appears to partially confirm this Palo Alto University professor’s allegations she was sexually assaulted during a high school party in 1982. U.S. President Donald Trump called Dr. Ford a credible witness and has now directed the Federal Bureau of Investigation to conduct a supplemental background check of controversial United States Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh, named by Dr. Ford as one of her alleged attackers. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is said to be encouraged “by the number of women coming forward to call out sexual misconduct” in MeToo America.

“Speech is a multidimensional stimulus” with “numerous ways you can extract a message from it,” explains Dr. Kourosh Saberi, Professor at the University of California, Irvine School of Social Sciences. Dr. Saberi coauthored research (reported by the journal Nature in 1999) using granular synthesis methods that time-reversed and resequenced human speech to test for intelligibility under conditions simulating transmission of audio signals over digital networks. This research informed now-widely implemented Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) telephony and was headlined by the Associated Press as “Human Brain Understands Backwards Speech”.

This reporter’s expert independent study replicated the granular audio synthesis methods used by scientific researchers (including sampling, granular time-reversal and resequencing) in an attempt to detect sleep talking-like unconscious messages reflected in the spoken word testimony of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford during her appearance before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday. The study was not in vain and in fact did detect traces of what appear to be a survivor’s disclosures of sexual assault at the hands of one or more men, substantiating public testimony of the witness.

The following results highlight these findings in bold followed by transcripts of the statements from which they were derived. Expert commentary is embedded between each of the results.

Saw that. Speaks it: I remember being on the street and feeling an enormous sense of relief that I had escaped from the house and that Brett and Mark were not coming after me. Brett’s assault on me drastically altered my life. For a very long time, I was too afraid and ashamed to tell anyone the details. I did not want to tell my parents that I, at age 15, was in a house without any parents present, drinking beer with boys.

Comment: This message appears to amplify Dr. Ford’s remarks, expressing how what she witnessed in the past is what was described during her appearance before the Senate Judicial Committee. It seems to be telling us that she saw those events of which she spoke at that time.

I saw this. Know what I am. 2) Heal victim. 3) He wounded. That knife. Had to have it. 4) You had a block. An exam: The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had completed an extensive remodel of our home, and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand. In explaining why I wanted to have a second front door, I described the assault in detail. I recall saying that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S. Supreme Court and spoke a bit about his background. My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh.

Comment: The speaker becomes verbose expressing a burst of multiple messages during this part of her statement. The first message emphasizes standing as a witness while validating cognition of her identity. This is followed by a call for relief directed towards a perceived injured party, as if such a party did exist in this case. The messages then describe a past injury occurring due to the actions of a male perpetrator.

The instrument used to cause injury is described as a knife. During her testimony Dr. Ford stated that a then-teenage Judge Kavanaugh began “grinding his hips into me” suggesting the possibility she was able to feel his erect genital organ. The phallus as an instrument of assault is here rendered by the speaker as a dangerously sharp pointed and bladed symbolic weapon capable of causing injury.

In the language of symbols this weaponized attribution can describe male fertility and sexual arousal whose outcome leads to death. Use of such symbolism further equates rape as an expression of human sacrifice. Insistence of perpetrators intent upon obtaining a trophy in sexual conquest is emphasized by the final part of the message. Sequential references to a block and an exam are consistent with Dr. Ford’s testimony in which she told the committee “I struggled academically” both immediately after the alleged assault and during college.

Penis shoves. He’s very close. 2) Law save us. You remember. Their own use. Abandoned you:  After that May 2012 therapy session, I did my best to suppress memories of the assault because recounting the details caused me to relive the experience, and caused panic attacks and anxiety. Occasionally I would discuss the assault in individual therapy, but talking about it caused me to relive the trauma, so I tried not to think about it or discuss it.

Comment: Here the symbolic phallus from earlier is now revealed as the male reproductive organ asserted by “grinding” where the sense of proximity is highlighted as well. By closeness the speaker may be describing physical proximity (“on top of me”) during a course of violent activities perceived as leading to sexual penetration and male orgasm during which Dr. Ford feared for her life. Opening remarks emphasized “I thought that Brett was accidentally going to kill me.”

An appeal to justice suggests Dr. Ford’s fundamental belief in the system of laws represented by the Supreme Court emphasized in her citation of civic duty as a key reason for her appearance before the committee. Affirming her recollection the messages goes on to cite feelings of exploitation and isolation, aligned with testimony stating “Both Brett and Mark were drunkenly laughing during the attack. They both seemed to be having a good time. Mark was urging Brett on, although at times he told Brett to stop. A couple of times I made eye contact with Mark and thought he might try to help me, but he did not.”

They rape her: But over the years, I went through periods where I thought about Brett’s attack. I confided in some close friends that I had an experience with sexual assault. Occasionally I stated that my assailant was a prominent lawyer or judge but I did not use his name. I do not recall each person I spoke to about Brett’s assault, and some friends have reminded me of these conversations since the publication of The Washington Post story on September 16, 2018.

Comment: Use of infinitive here suggests an incident that perpetuates in the mind of the victim long after the alleged assault is over. While Dr. Ford does not claim to be have been physically penetrated, her feelings of diminished personhood and psychological injury can be understood as consequences of trespasses of personal boundaries resulting from a non-consensual physical attack. It seems that during the reported incident Dr. Ford perceived intent to rape and that she was confronted by perpetrators who had already raped her in their minds.

Citations of terror offered to the committee also suggested Dr. Ford’s concerns that her appearance Thursday to discuss these allegations could potentially (and already had in the public sphere) serve to further abuse resulting in the social and psychological rape of her reputation and personhood. “I am here today not because I want to be. I am terrified. I am here because I believe it is my civic duty to tell you what happened to me while Brett Kavanaugh and I were in high school,” Dr. Ford stated in opening remarks.

My nerve. I’m damaged. 2) He rapes. The death bar. 3) The man broke me. 4) Give us some soda: But until July 2018, I had never named Mr. Kavanaugh as my attacker outside of therapy. This all changed in early July 2018. I saw press reports stating that Brett Kavanaugh was on the “short list” of potential Supreme Court nominees. I thought it was my civic duty to relay the information I had about Mr. Kavanaugh’s conduct so that those considering his potential nomination would know about this assault.

Comment: Dr. Ford’s fragility was evident in her presentation and testimony where for example she claimed to have insisted against her husband’s wishes on renovating the Ford family home to include two front doors as a means of alleviating apparent lifelong feelings of claustrophobia resulting from the reported assault.

Rape again appears in the infinitive ascribed to a male assailant within a near-fatal context consistent with witness testimony. The words “death” and “bar” are paired together in sequence. Psychological implications of a reported sexual assault’s aftermath are here expressed in a phallic way that alludes to the male organ’s geometry in terms of language common to both alcohol dispensaries and legal institutions of which the alleged assailant is a highly visible consumer, a member and nominee.

The notion of ruptured identity as consequence of a male perpetrator’s crimes against a minor is here expressed using language also found in testimony ascribed to another victim who survived severe sexual and physical abuse proven in a court of law. In a recent report published by People an anonymous survivor of New Mexico’s Aggressive Christianity Missions Training Corps was said to have explained how “Emotionally, she broke me as a child to the point where I still today struggle with my own self-confidence, my self-esteem, my sense of worth.” Based upon such testimony founding leader Deborah Greene was sentenced to 72 years in prison by a Thirteenth Judicial District Court judge.

The final reference to soda is consistent with the large bottle of Coca Cola from which Dr. Ford poured soda into her glass during Thursday’s appearance before the committee. This reference appears to bring the content of her messages into compliance with then-present-time events during which she accused Judge Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault. Parallelism with present events gives rise to the suggestion that the otherwise unnamed 1982 male rapist described in her messages may have indeed been the accused nominee of today.

Recommended Reading

‘She’s a Spy’: Alleged Russian Operative Maria Butina Disclosed Secret Agent Status at 2015 FreedomFest

‘Sex with Daddy’: Helsinki Secret Messages Confirm Trump a Putin Proxy

Behind the yellow mask: Trump spills urophile secrets at ‘Watersportsgate’ presser

‘Lie for Russia’: President Trump Kompromat, evidence encrypted in statements to CIA

Anna Chapman’s secret messages named youth accomplice, anticipated handler’s betrayal