NATO in Dallas: New analysis of Dallas Police Chief ‘Democracy-Changing’ sniper incident remarks

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC – Exclusive new video published to YouTube on July 8, 2012, purports to reveal evidence of globalist intervention behind a sniper incident during a Black Lives Matter protest in Dallas, Texas, in which five police officers are reported dead. Dallas Police Chief David Brown spoke to reporters during a press conference held earlier this morning when he denied any democracy-changing implications of the so-called ambush. Meanwhile, one alleged shooter was said to have been executed at the scene by police using a robot as a VBIED, the first use of such a device in the history of American justice.

The sound of high-powered weapons fire ended a Black Lives Matter protest last night held in memory of the most recent shooting victims from police violence taking place across the country. Social media video posts showed crowds scattering as police and other first-responders rushed into danger. Some of the video depicted police being shot or lying injured on the pavement.

Protesters had earlier paid peaceful tribute to the memories of Philando Castile and Alton Sterling, African-American men apparently shot in execution-style encounters with police earlier this week. Those deaths were observed by President Obama in remarks broadcast from the NATO summit held in Warsaw, Poland. The shooting deaths of police officers in Dallas would appear to offer cannon fodder for political theater in Warsaw during the three-day summit, a perspective seriously underlined by the police chief’s sleep talking-like remarks.

By invoking NATO in such a manner the chief offers perspective concerning questions related to Gladio-like state-sponsored terrorism occurring domestically. One source describes a role for the CIA in NATO Operation Gladio post-WW2 anti-communist operations and domestic terrorism in Italy during the 1970s. A parallel CIA Phoenix Program oversaw identifying and “neutralizing” (via infiltration, capture, terrorism, torture, and assassination) the infrastructure of domestic governments in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War.

Previous NewsInsideOut 2016 coverage of international violence and unrest identified Mossad and CIA in Brussels, the political assassination of LaVoy Finicum in Oregon, the CIA Phoenix Program in Maidan, CIA intervention in Canadian national politics, San Bernardino links to the Boston Marathon bombing and more. Agency names, acronyms and metonyms were then offered freely by involuntary disclosures on the part of numerous influential parties involved.

The presence of previously unreported forensic information concerning secret messages encrypted within Dallas Police Chief David Brown’s remarks to the press was detected while monitoring mirror-filtered renderings of those statements. The audio soundtrack was loaded in the edit bay of a digital audio workstation then subjected to mirror-filtering and time-expansion in preparation for a detailed auditory study. The conduct of this procedure was informed by best practices refined through repeatedly providing military, forensic and medical-grade intelligence that had been successfully vetted through practical real-world feedback over nearly 20 years of unmatched research and reporting.

NewsInsideOut.com coverage has described how the same procedure publicly revealed details of the Iraq War, identified the BTK Killer, named Russian spy Anna Chapman’s accomplice and uncovered the UFOs and ETs in Edward Snowden’s NSA cache weeks, months and years before such information became widely-accepted public knowledge.

Below is a partial transcript of Dallas Police Chief David Brown’s remarks to the press from July 8, 2016, preceded by the secret messages encrypted backwards therein with emphasis added.

It was NATO: “Again I just want to expand on the mayor’s comments. Police officers are guardians of this great democracy. The freedom to protest, the freedom of speech, the freedom for expression; all freedoms we fight for with our lives. It’s what makes us who we are as Americans. We risk our lives for those rights. We won’t militarize our policing standards but we will do it in a much safer way every time, like we chose to do it this time. We had an adequate amount of officers at this scene. We were blocking traffic and doing all the things to protect people’s right to protest and their free speech. We are not going to let a coward who would ambush police officers change our democracy.”

Note to Chief Brown: The 1990s are over. The Atlantic wrote in 2013 that “Secrecy Has Already Corroded Our Democracy in Real Ways. The renewal of the Patriot Act is a case study in how opaque policy and law destroy a people’s ability to self-govern.”

Recommended Reading

‘Primacy of the American Sniper’: A Hard-Hitting Two-Hour News Exposé with Jon Kelly

‘Murder’: Secret Messages of the LaVoy Finicum Shooting and Political Assassination

‘American Sniper’ in San Bernardino

‘American Sniper’ Chris Kyle’s heroin addiction and media mafia demons

Maidan Conspiracy Redux: British black ops in Kiev sniper attacks

Mossad named in Brussels attacks according to new analysis of second witness to Zaventem airport explosions testimony

CIA named in Brussels attacks according to new analysis of Zaventem airport explosions witness testimony

NATO in Dallas: New analysis of Dallas Police Chief ‘Democracy-Changing’ sniper incident remarks

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC – Exclusive new video published to YouTube on July 8, 2012, purports to reveal evidence of globalist intervention behind a sniper incident during a Black Lives Matter protest in Dallas, Texas, in which five police officers are reported dead. Dallas Police Chief David Brown spoke to reporters during a press conference held earlier this morning when he denied any democracy-changing implications of the so-called ambush. Meanwhile, one alleged shooter was said to have been executed at the scene by police using a robot as a VBIED, the first use of such a device in the history of American justice.

The sound of high-powered weapons fire ended a Black Lives Matter protest last night held in memory of the most recent shooting victims from police violence taking place across the country. Social media video posts showed crowds scattering as police and other first-responders rushed into danger. Some of the video depicted police being shot or lying injured on the pavement.

Protesters had earlier paid peaceful tribute to the memories of Philando Castile and Alton Sterling, African-American men apparently shot in execution-style encounters with police earlier this week. Those deaths were observed by President Obama in remarks broadcast from the NATO summit held in Warsaw, Poland. The shooting deaths of police officers in Dallas would appear to offer cannon fodder for political theater in Warsaw during the three-day summit, a perspective seriously underlined by the police chief’s sleep talking-like remarks.

By invoking NATO in such a manner the chief offers perspective concerning questions related to Gladio-like state-sponsored terrorism occurring domestically. One source describes a role for the CIA in NATO Operation Gladio post-WW2 anti-communist operations and domestic terrorism in Italy during the 1970s. A parallel CIA Phoenix Program oversaw identifying and “neutralizing” (via infiltration, capture, terrorism, torture, and assassination) the infrastructure of domestic governments in Southeast Asia during the Vietnam War.

Previous NewsInsideOut 2016 coverage of international violence and unrest identified Mossad and CIA in Brussels, the political assassination of LaVoy Finicum in Oregon, the CIA Phoenix Program in Maidan, CIA intervention in Canadian national politics, San Bernardino links to the Boston Marathon bombing and more. Agency names, acronyms and metonyms were then offered freely by involuntary disclosures on the part of numerous influential parties involved.

The presence of previously unreported forensic information concerning secret messages encrypted within Dallas Police Chief David Brown’s remarks to the press was detected while monitoring mirror-filtered renderings of those statements. The audio soundtrack was loaded in the edit bay of a digital audio workstation then subjected to mirror-filtering and time-expansion in preparation for a detailed auditory study. The conduct of this procedure was informed by best practices refined through repeatedly providing military, forensic and medical-grade intelligence that had been successfully vetted through practical real-world feedback over nearly 20 years of unmatched research and reporting.

NewsInsideOut.com coverage has described how the same procedure publicly revealed details of the Iraq War, identified the BTK Killer, named Russian spy Anna Chapman’s accomplice and uncovered the UFOs and ETs in Edward Snowden’s NSA cache weeks, months and years before such information became widely-accepted public knowledge.

Below is a partial transcript of Dallas Police Chief David Brown’s remarks to the press from July 8, 2016, preceded by the secret messages encrypted backwards therein with emphasis added.

It was NATO: “Again I just want to expand on the mayor’s comments. Police officers are guardians of this great democracy. The freedom to protest, the freedom of speech, the freedom for expression; all freedoms we fight for with our lives. It’s what makes us who we are as Americans. We risk our lives for those rights. We won’t militarize our policing standards but we will do it in a much safer way every time, like we chose to do it this time. We had an adequate amount of officers at this scene. We were blocking traffic and doing all the things to protect people’s right to protest and their free speech. We are not going to let a coward who would ambush police officers change our democracy.”

Note to Chief Brown: The 1990s are over. The Atlantic wrote in 2013 that “Secrecy Has Already Corroded Our Democracy in Real Ways. The renewal of the Patriot Act is a case study in how opaque policy and law destroy a people’s ability to self-govern.”

Recommended Reading

‘Primacy of the American Sniper’: A Hard-Hitting Two-Hour News Exposé with Jon Kelly

‘Murder’: Secret Messages of the LaVoy Finicum Shooting and Political Assassination

‘American Sniper’ in San Bernardino

‘American Sniper’ Chris Kyle’s heroin addiction and media mafia demons

Maidan Conspiracy Redux: British black ops in Kiev sniper attacks

Mossad named in Brussels attacks according to new analysis of second witness to Zaventem airport explosions testimony

CIA named in Brussels attacks according to new analysis of Zaventem airport explosions witness testimony

Obama cites Hollande death in Paris Attacks secret message

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC – An exclusive new video published to YouTube on November 13, 2015, purports to document the discovery of evidence that President Barack Obama has received credible intelligence concerning the personal security of French President François Hollande. The president spoke yesterday in the wake of the Paris attacks in France that left nearly 160 dead as of this writing and the country under a state of emergency. In his statement to the press, President Obama described the tragedy as “An attack on all of humanity and the universal values that we share.”

Agence France-Presse reported in March 2014 how a jihadist group “repeated its calls for French president Francois Hollande‘s assassination in revenge for the European nation’s recent interventions in Africa,” It went on to state how the “al-Minbar Jihadi Media Network, a militant Islamist web site with ties to al-Qaeda, says it wants Muslims to stage attacks in France and on French interests elsewhere in support of Muslims in Central African Republic and Mali.” Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull was reported saying that yesterday’s attacks appeared “to have all the hallmarks of Daesh [ISIS/CIA].”

The sentiment of President Obama’s unconscious disclosure suggests a possible shift in relations between the U.S. with France now the target of another potential “Je Suis CIA” covert false-flag attack intended to destabilize the government. Although it is not exactly clear what may have soured relations between the two leaders, Paris was previously the scene of attacks at the offices of satire publication Charlie Hebdo that took place in January of this year. It was an event that further highlighted what some call a clash of civilizations with front lines now appearing entrenched in major European cities.

Charlie Hebdo: Je Suis CIA LieThe New York Times wrote in May, 2012, how President Obama had reserved for himself the final moral calculations necessary for ordering drone strikes against targets drawn from secret kill lists. The Bureau of Investigative Journalism reported in October that total drone strikes under Obama in Pakistan, Somalia and Yemen then numbered 491. Whichever of those strikes involved the presence of family or members of the public (think wedding parties), the president envisaged their deaths (according to the command structure reported by the Times).

According to the newly released video, such a veteran morbid stare has now set conceptual sights upon the French president. According to the Australian prime minister it was CIA’s proxy army ISIS who conducted today’s attacks.

An intelligence assessment of the soundtrack from the president’s statement utilized a mirror filter to digitally reflect his speech signal in order to detect unconscious communications. Like the mirror on a reflector telescope, such impressions offer provably accurate insight into a streaming subtext of sleep talking-like comments from inner space.
NewsInsideOut.com has previously reported how the same procedure publicly revealed details of the Iraq War, identified the BTK Killer, named Russian spy Anna Chapman’s accomplice and uncovered the UFOs and ETs in Edward Snowden’s NSA cache weeks, months and years before such information became widely-accepted public knowledge. Below is a partial transcript of President Barack Obama’s statement, followed by the secret message encrypted backwards therein.

President Obama: “I’ve chosen not to call President Hollande at this time, because my expectation is that he’s very busy at the moment. I actually by coincidence was talking to him earlier today in preparation for the G-20 meeting. But I am confident that that I will be in direct communication with him in the next few days, and we’ll be coordinating in any ways that they think are helpful in the investigation of what’s happened.”

Secret Message: “I see him dead.”

Here is the verbatim of his remarks as reported by ABC New York:

“Once again, we’ve seen an outrageous attempt to terrorize innocent civilians. This is an attack not just on Paris, it’s an attack not just on the people of France. But this is an attack on all of humanity and the universal values that we share. We stand prepared and ready to provide whatever assistance the government and the people of France need to respond.

“France is our oldest ally. The French people have stood shoulder to shoulder with the United States time and again, and we want to be very clear that we stand together with them in the fight against terrorism and extremism. Paris itself represents the timeless values of human progress. Those who think that they can terrorize the people of France or the values that they stand for are wrong.

“The American people draw strength from the French people’s commitment to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. We are reminded in this time of tragedy that the bonds of liberte, egalite, fraternite are not only values that the French people care so deeply about, but they are values that we share. And those values are going to endure far beyond any act of terrorism or the hateful vision of those who perpetrated the crimes this evening. And we are going to do whatever it takes to work with the French people and with nations around the world to bring these terrorists to justice and to go after any terrorist networks that goes after our people.

“We don’t yet know all the details of what has happened. We have been in contact with French officials to communicate our deepest condolences to the families of those who have been killed, to offer our prayers and thoughts to those who’ve been wounded. We have offered our full support to them. The situation is still unfolding. I’ve chosen not to call President Hollande at this time, because my expectation is that he’s very busy at the moment. I actually by coincidence was talking to him earlier today in preparation for the G-20 meeting. But I am confident that that I will be in direct communication with him in the next few days, and we’ll be coordinating in any ways that they think are helpful in the investigation of what’s happened.

“This is a heartbreaking situation, and obviously those of us here in the United States knows what it’s like. We’ve gone through these kinds of episodes ourselves, and whenever these kinds of attacks happen, we’ve always been able to count on the French people to stand with us. They have been an extraordinary counterterrorism partner, and we intend to be available to them in that same fashion. I’m sure that in the days ahead, we’ll learn more about exactly what happened, and my teams will make sure that we are in communication with the press to provide you accurate information. I don’t want to speculate at this point in terms of who is responsible for this. It appears that there may still be live activity and dangers that are taking place as we speak. And so until we know from French officials that the situation is under control and we have more information about it, I don’t want to speculate.”

Recommended Reading

Syrian Refugees: Assad involuntarily cites ‘threatening prophecy’

Edward Snowden’s UFOs Part 2: Psychic human ETs revealed

Justin Trudeau’s ‘alien crystal’: Canada staging executive psychonaut contact with ETs

Cheney’s ‘Kiss of Shame’: A satanic torture conspiracy revealed

Trailer: ‘UFO Canyon’ reveals secrets of off-grid backcountry Canadian contact

 

 

Former Canadian diplomat: NATO US stooge in Ukraine crisis

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC –Video of retired Canadian diplomat James Bissett’s appearance at the University of Ottawa revealed concerns that imperialist  unilateralism through pre-emptive military strikes conducted by NATO on behalf of U.S. interests is fundamental to foreign and defense policy in an era where no visible peace movement stands in protest. The former ambassador to Yugoslavia, Albania and Bulgaria offered personal first-hand testimony of history leading to the Euromaidan protests at an event titled “United Ukraine? The Euromaidan revolution and the Donbas rebellion in domestic and international perspectives” held with support of the university’s Graduate School of Public and International Affairs.

In a taped lecture from early December James Bissett cited the 1992 “Defense Planning Guidance, FY 1994-1999” (aka the “Wolfowitz Doctrine”) as critical in understanding European history since the fall of the Berlin Wall. That document was first authored by Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Paul Wolfowitz and convicted perjurer Scooter Libby then later revised under reported close supervision by convicted war criminal/reported Satanist U.S. Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell.

The retired diplomat emphasized roles played by the breach of NATO’s treaty in Bosnia, U.S. arming of KLA terrorists, historic peacekeeping attempts of Russian President Vladimir Putin and NATO’s new mission as defined by President Bill Clinton, comprised of pre-emptive military strikes and interventions on a march of destruction leading to the front door of nuclear-armed Russia. Such exclusive critical commentary emerges in a time when Western anti-Putin propaganda continues in a seemingly unending crescendo of lies targeting a country whose Emergencies Ministry is responsible for sending a reported nearly 11,000 tons of relief aid to Donetsk and Lugansk since August 11th of this year.

The following is a transcript of former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, Albania and Bulgaria James Bissett’s speech to “United Ukraine? The Euromaidan revolution and the Donbas rebellion in domestic and international perspectives” held at the University of Ottawa December 4, 2014. This transcript has been edited for clarity.

“Thank you very much. I’m really delighted and pleased to be here today.

“I find the situation in Ukraine to be terribly tragic. You can see from the title of my speech today (or my talk) that I hold the U.S.-led NATO powers primarily responsible for what’s happening there. As the lady from Somalia said earlier there’s a pattern here. You’ve seen it not only in Ukraine but you’ve seen it in regime change often by force, if not by force by bribing and providing NGOs with money and so on to support the U.S. cause. Egypt, Iraq, Afghanistan; whose been doing all of the interventions, whose been doing all the bombing?

“It hasn’t been Putin. It hasn’t been Russia. They’re held responsible for that, as was Gaddafi, as was Milosevic, as was a list of “bad guys.” When the U.S. calls you a “bad guy” then you’re a bad guy and out comes the propaganda. The tragedy of Ukraine is that it’s being destroyed. It’s not only Eastern Ukraine that probably will never be able to recover economically. It’s Ukraine itself. The big deal that the European Union offered Ukraine a year ago or so to become an associate member of the European Union, what did it mean?

“It didn’t mean one Euro dollar. It meant some sort of association and friendship. When it was countered by Putin with a $15B deal it’s little wonder that the Ukrainian president bought into that rather than the false promise by the EU.

“I’m finding it really sad and dreadful that Ukrainians were killed in this. It’s a totally unnecessary war. It’s on the hundredth anniversary of the First World War. You would think that we’d learned something from what happened in the first part of the twentieth century: two cataclysmic world wars, millions of people killed. Now we’re not even into fourteen years of the twenty-first century and we’re doing the same thing. It’s really a condemnation of our political leaders.

“What’s happening in Ukraine is what’s happened elsewhere right since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the fall of the Berlin Wall. The Americans, who had a wonderful opportunity of instituting a Pax Americana, where the United States with its life of liberty and pursuit of happiness could finally maybe prevail and they screwed it up. They didn’t do that.

“They didn’t offer Russia (that collapsed) and the other members of the Soviet Union one iota of help. After the Second World War we had the Marshall Plan that brought the Germans back into economic survival, the Japanese were forgiven. And what happened when the Soviet Union collapsed? Nothing. Not an ounce of aid was offered. And in fact what happened was a resurgence of American military power because when the Soviet Union collapsed people began to wonder “Why do we have NATO,” this powerful military machine in the middle of Europe?

“Expensive and totally unnecessary. Who was the enemy? They had to find an enemy.

“George Kennan, who was perhaps the most famous U.S. ambassador in Moscow for years and who was responsible for the containment policy that kept the Communists back, said in 1980, in the middle of the Cold War and I can quote it almost from memory, he wrote that should the Soviet Union drown beneath the waters of the ocean tomorrow, the United States would have to reconstitute it within three or four days, or the whole economy of the United States would collapse.

[Quote: “Were the Soviet Union to sink tomorrow under the waters of the ocean, the American military-industrial establishment would have to go on, substantially unchanged, until some other adversary could be invented. Anything else would be an unacceptable shock to the American economy.”]

“He kept writing until his death that the expansion of NATO eastward was a mistake; any attempt to keep Russia down was a foolish move. That’s of course what happened because when the Soviet Union collapsed NATO had to find a reason for existence and they found it with the breakup of Yugoslavia. I happened to be there. I saw, I witnessed this first-hand.

“Remember, I was an old Cold War warrior. I was proud of NATO. Canada’s foreign minister Louis St. Laurent played a major role in the formation of NATO. When the Europeans were deciding to have a defense pact, he persuaded the Europeans to invite the United States and Canada in the form of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization. This is critically important because Article 1 of the NATO treaty said (and again I can quote it) that NATO will never use or threaten to use force in the resolution of international disputes and will always act in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

[Article 1: “The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.”]

“It became, in effect, the kind of military arm of the United Nations. That was an obstacle for American aggrandizement. They didn’t like Article 1. Article 1 prevented them from doing what they always wanted to do, having NATO at the forefront of many of their foreign policy objectives so it didn’t look as though America was doing these things. It looked like NATO was doing them.

“They broke Article 1 of the treaty starting in Bosnia where they had the bombing. They decided in Bosnia that they would support the Muslim cause there rather than the Serbian cause. I was there at the time there was a referendum in Bosnia headed by the Muslim leader [Alija Izetbegović, president of Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1990-96)] who had joined up with the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1980s, who was a fundamental Islamist (and he made no bones about it; he’d written a book about it: his “Mein Kampf”). [Possible reference to “Notes from Prison, 1983-1988”]

“He had a referendum. The referendum failed because the Serbian population, the Christian population didn’t vote for it at the time. He then signed an agreement with the Serb leader or the Croatian’s leader in Lisbon in the spring of 1992 that if Bosnia did separate there’d be three autonomous regions. That was signed in Lisbon.

[Source: “The Carrington–Cutileiro peace plan, named for its authors Lord Carrington and Portuguese ambassador José Cutileiro, resulted from the EC Peace Conference held in February 1992 in an attempt to prevent Bosnia-Herzegovina sliding into war. It proposed ethnic power-sharing on all administrative levels and the devolution of central government to local ethnic communities. However, all Bosnia-Herzegovina’s districts would be classified as Muslim, Serb or Croat under the plan, even where no ethnic majority was evident.]

“When he came back to Sarajevo after signing that my neighbor, who lived across the street from me, the U.S. ambassador decided that that was not what the Americans wanted, flew to Sarajevo and said to Izetbegović, “Why did you sign this stupid agreement? Why don’t you simply declare unilateral independence?” And Izetbegović said “If we do, we’ll have a civil war. There’s no way that Christian Serbs are going to live under Muslim rule. Warren Zimmermann, my neighbor, the ambassador said “Declare unilateral independence. We will support you, militarily if necessary.”

“What happened? A civil war; 200,000 people killed. Quite unnecessary but it was done. They later intervened in Kosovo. They decided that because the Europeans, France and Germany were beginning to think of maybe getting out of NATO and forming their own defensive organization the Americans decided we must move eastward. A good chunk of land was Kosovo, where there was trouble in Kosovo between the Albanian minority and the Serbian security forces. I notice one of the points upon this little document that I would challenge, “NATO’s Kosovo Operation: A Valid Excuse” and it says “In Kosovo there was an actual humanitarian crisis.”

“In fact there was no humanitarian crisis. The Americans armed and equipped the Kosovo Liberation Army, sent them back into Kosovo to assassinate Serbian mayors, shoot Serbian policemen, knowing that the Serbs would retaliate (which they did). There was fighting in Kosovo but there was no mass ethnic cleansing. All that took place after the NATO bombing of Kosovo. The U.N. has proven that. [Source: “KLA is still present in the MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base list of terrorist groups, and is listed as an inactive terrorist organisation by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.”]

“Kosovo was important because that’s when the Americans broke the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Article 1. The Americans decided that they would bomb Serbia, a country that had no weapons of mass destruction, was not a threat to anyone except trying to put down an armed rebellion in their own country. And they bombed Serbia for 78 days and 78 nights. They did it in a violation of international law, a violation of Article 1 of the NATO treaty, of the Helsinki Accord and of the United Nations Charter.

“Who warned them not to do this? Putin. Putin warned them not to do this. And when later on, they persuaded the Albanians, after the Serbs had left Albania (ethnically cleansed I might add) they then asked for the Albanians to declare what? Unilateral independence. There was no referendum. They just said “Declare independence. We, the Americans, the United States and our allies and NATO will recognize your independence,“ which they did. Who warned them not to do that? Putin.

“Putin said, “You’re breaking international law. You’re opening a Pandora’s Box here so that any little country or region of a country can declare unilateral independence and you shouldn’t do it. And if you do do it, I’ve got a couple of places where I might want to do it.” He named Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria. That was done in March 1999 during the bombing of Kosovo. All of this I’m leading up to how it relates to Ukraine.

“On NATO’s 50th birthday party held in Washington, Bill Clinton was the guy (and his gang. I met some of them: Madeleine Albright, [United States Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke (2009-10)]. These were not in my opinion good people.)

“On the 50th anniversary of NATO’s birthday party they not only were bombing Serbia. By the way, they dropped cluster bombs on the marketplace in Niš on a Saturday afternoon where little old ladies were out buying their carrots. They couldn’t hit any of the military targets so they did a tremendous bombing campaign that went on for that length of time. People forget that but I don’t forget it because I was around then.

[Source: “On 7 May 1999, between the time of 11:30 and 11:40, a NATO attack was carried out with two containers of cluster bombs directed at Niš Airport, located at the end of the city. The bombs missed their target and fell near the city center. The bombs were scattered from the two containers and were carried by the wind and then fell in three locations in the central part of the city: The Pathology building next to the Medical Center of Niš in the south of the city, next to the building of “Banovina” including the main market, bus station next to the Niš Fortress and “12th February” Health Centre, parking of “Niš Express” near the Nišava River. A report from Human Rights Watch stated that 15 civilians were killed, with another 28 injured.”]

“In addition to that they broke their promise that they had made to Gorbachev [President of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev (1990-91)] that if the Russians allowed a united Germany into NATO that then NATO would not expand eastward. In March 1999 not only did they bomb Serbia but at that 50th birthday party Billy Clinton announced a new role for NATO. That is NATO can now operate out of territory and it can bomb militarily or intervene militarily anywhere and wherever they want to do, with or without U.N. approval.

[Quote: “We’ve also reaffirmed our determination repeatedly to intensify our actions, military and economic, until we achieve our objectives in Kosovo … We cannot expect for people to stop being drawn back to old ways of organizing themselves, even profoundly destructive ways resting on ethnic and religious divisions, unless there is a far more powerful magnate out there before them.”]

“In addition to that, in the same month they let into NATO Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic, breaking the promise to Gorbachev. Since then, as you know, they’ve got Russia completely encircled by the former members of the Soviet Union, none of them friendly with Russia (with good historical reasons) and they’re putting military bases there. The great prize for the Americans of course is Ukraine and it didn’t look as though they were going to get it until the Maidan [Euromaidan protests in Kiev marked by neo-nazi violence and sniper fire leading to overthrow of the democratically government].

“There’s a question about whether they actually instigated the uprising. I don’t think they necessarily did. I think initially it was a fed-up Ukrainian people who saw no hope for their country. They were tired, they were out of work, they moan for their kids and they started protesting and probably rightly so. But at that point the Americans saw an opportunity and stepped in. Victoria Nuland, whose the head of the European division of the State Department [Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs] flew into the Maidan. Senator McCain, the warlord who’ll fight anybody, he flew in there. Even our own foreign minister was there.

“They just used the Ukraine as a pawn. I don’t think they’re going to get away with it because they gave Putin a wonderful opportunity to get the Crimea back (which he did) and Russia is not to be played with militarily; they have the nuclear bomb. I was once in India trying to persuade the Indian government not to recognize Kosovo and complaining bitterly about what happened in Yugoslavia. An Indian military man asked if he could put a question to me and I said “Yes” and he said “There’s a big difference between India and Serbia, ambassador.”

“I said, “What’s that?” He said, “India has the bomb. Serbia does not.” Russia has the bomb. There is no way that Russia can allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO any more than they would allow Georgia to become a member of NATO. This is in their national interest. Certainly the Americans knew what was going to happen when Khrushchev was going to put missiles in Cuba [Former First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Nikita Khrushchev, the 1962 Cuban missile crisis]. Of course they wouldn’t allow it and rightly so.

“The future for Ukraine is not a happy one but it’s a sad and tragic thing that they’re killing each other because they’re simply a pawn in a much bigger game. It’s not going to be [President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko] who decides to stop the fighting. It’s going to be Obama and I’m not sure Obama cares. I’m not sure he even knows where Ukraine is and that’s the problem. Republicans are more war-like than the Democrats so the situation in the future is not a very healthy or happy one.

“What’s the origin of this American passion to rule the world? It starts again in 1992. The U.S. had a defense planning document. It’s a very critical document and it explains a great deal of all the things that will happen since the fall of the Berlin Wall. [Download PDF: “Defense Planning Guidance, FY 1994-1999”]

“I’m going to read a bit of it. It was in 1992. The Defense Planning document envisaged the U.S.A. as the world’s strongman dominating every other country and locking down the Middle East oil supplies for its own use. That was one of its primary objectives. The other objective was to prevent the rise of any global power from dominating a region whose resources would generate a global power to rival the United States. The document refers to the former Soviet Union and the danger that Russia might one day again aspire to challenge U.S. hegemony in Europe and calls for a unilateral U.S. defense guarantee of Eastern Europe in cooperation with other NATO allies.

“The Planning document explains a great deal about what happened since then and they’re not stopping it. Ukraine is simply another example. I think this time they’ve run into something that they’re not going to be able to resolve very easily. But how are we going to stop it? Interestingly enough there’s no peace movement any more in the United States or in Canada or anywhere. It’s a shame. Look at the Vietnam War, the demonstrations, people out on the streets saying “Come on, stop this killing. Let’s get down to talking.” And that’s gone by the board. It’s unfortunate.”

Recommended Reading

Maidan Conspiracy Redux: British black ops in Kiev sniper attacks

Cheney’s ‘Kiss of Shame’: A satanic torture conspiracy revealed

CIA Torture: American Heroes or Sadistic Psychopaths? You Decide!

‘Planet Jonestown’ reveals drone warrior’s mind control secrets

MH370: CIA front Inmarsat’s SIGNINT Iran nuclear missile secrets revealed