Vancouver, BC – Exclusive TrueTube by NewsInsideOut.com video published July 18, 2018, exposes the unconscious confession of alleged Russian spy Maria Butina. Granular analysis of the soundtrack from an on camera interview recorded at FreedomFest 2015 in Las Vegas, Nevada, reveals the suspect’s sleep talking-like disclosure encrypted within a resequenced time-reversed audio sample. The U.S. Department of Justice was said to have charged the gun rights organizer with felony conspiracy in Washington D.C. on Monday, the day of the 2018 Russia-United States summit in Helsinki, Finland. Press reports link Maria Butina to the National Rifle Association, the Republican Party and the 2016 Trump Campaign.
UPDATE: On December 13, 2018, Russian citizen Maria Butina pleaded guilty in federal court to conspiring to influence U.S. politics through her connections to the National Rifle Association. NewsInsideOut.com’s independent investigation identified the Russian secret agent status of Maria Butina in this article published six months earlier. 2011 coverage by this reporter named Anna Chapman’s youth accomplice in the Russian “Illegals Program” case. The Wall Street Journal confirmed citing official sources nine months later.
The U.S. president spoke at FreedomFest 2015 offering his perspectives on Russian-U.S. relations at the dawn of his campaign where he explained “I know Putin. And I tell you what. We get along with Putin. Putin has no respect for President Obama. Big problem. Big problem. And Russia has been driven. You know, I’ve always heard, for years I’ve heard, one of the worst things that can happen to our country is if Russia ever gets driven to China.”
“I believe I would get along very nicely with Putin,” the president continued, “Okay? And I mean, where we have the strength.”
The New York Times Wednesday described how “President Trump appeared to say on Wednesday that Russia was no longer targeting the United States, contradicting his own intelligence chief just a day after promising that his administration was working to prevent Kremlin interference in the upcoming midterm elections. “Hours later,” the report went on to say, “The White House press secretary, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, said that Mr. Trump was answering a different question, and that “we believe the threat still exists.””
In a separate news brief Reuters claimed “U.S. intelligence officials have said Russia’s efforts to undermine elections are continuing and now target the Nov. 6 congressional elections.” In court documents the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation was said to elaborate further how “Moscow seeks to create wedges that reduce trust and confidence in democratic processes, degrade democratization efforts, weaken US partnerships with European allies, undermine Western sanctions, encourage anti-US political views, and counter efforts to bring Ukraine and other former Soviet states into European institutions.”
In charges filed Wednesday prosecutors described a “Red Sparrow” (2018) scenario in which 29 year-old suspect Maria Butina is alleged to have attempted to trade sex for influence.
NewsInsideOut.com has previously discussed an historic 2011 report that identified Russian SVR “Illegals Program” youth operative Tim Foley when his name appeared in granular audio analysis of Anna Chapman’s on camera interview at a New York human resources convention. Anna Chapman pleaded guilty in 2010 to conspiracy to act as an agent of a foreign government without notifying the U.S. Attorney General in a case resembling Maria Butina’s. In 2012 the Wall Street Journal confirmed Tim Foley’s identity nine months after “Tim” was first named as an accomplice to a “Vegas drop”.
NewsInsideOut.com coverage of Monday’s 2018 Russia-United States summit in Helsinki, Finland, considered how the U.S. President exhibited behaviors of a paternal incest survivor. According to granular analysis of his statements at that day’s press conference, the president was heard to pass sleep talking-like comments regarding “dildos” and “sex with daddy.” A report that appeared the following day on a local NYC website featured a July 17, 2018, photograph of a bare-chested Putin imitator astride the Wall Street Bull where the bronze tourist attraction is shown covered in dildos.
One possible interpretation of these overnight events suggests domestic intelligence insiders familiar with the president’s exposure weaponized that art display in a Kompromat dog whistle PSYOP.
Speech is a multidimensional stimulus where granular analysis can resequence locally time-reversed grains of speech to synthesize new meaning from digital reflections of the audio soundtrack. A series of NewsInsideOut.com reports (see links below) have described how this approach successfully determined facts of global wars, serial killer identities as well as Russian, Israeli and U.S. intelligence operations days, weeks, months and years before they were accepted as mainstream knowledge.
Below is a partial transcript of the secret message heard in the video ‘’’She’s a Spy’: Maria Butina Disclosed Russian Agent Status at FreedomFest 2015” where a message from a July 2015 conference video is indicated in bold followed by the context in which it was discovered.
She’s a spy: In Russia I’m the founder and now I’m a board member of the Right to Bear Arms. This is an all-Russian public organization. We promote gun rights. I made this trip because I think that freedom is very important and basic of any freedom is of course gun rights, economy. And I would like to know more and bring this knowledge to Russia. I’m travelling from Moscow, from Russia. And I hope it will be useful to my country.
According to one source “FreedomFest is an annual festival where free minds meet to celebrate “great books, great ideas, and great thinkers” in an open-minded society. It is independent, non-partisan, and not affiliated with any organization or think tank. Founded and produced by Mark Skousen since 2002, FreedomFest invites the “best and the brightest” from around the world to talk, strategize, socialize, and celebrate liberty. FreedomFest is open to all and is purely egalitarian, where speakers, attendees, and exhibitors are treated as equals.”
Vancouver, BC – Exclusive TrueTube video published July 16, 2018, exposes secret messages from U.S. President Trump at Monday’s press conference confirming Trump’s presidency as a Russian espionage operation. According to the video, indicting remarks heard at the 2018 Russian-United States summit press conference held in Helsinki, Finland, reinforced earlier urophilia claims of the Steele dossier, submissive role play allegations of Stormy Daniels and incestuous remarks directed at daughter Ivanka Trump. Questions concerning the U.S. president’s public abuses of allies (including Canada and the U.K.) while embracing and defending tyrannical dictators Kim, Duterte and Putin can now be answered in terms of Trump’s role as a Putin proxy on a mission to disrupt Western civilization.
UPDATE: NYC website report dated July 17, 2018, cites “Wall Street Bull Decorated Overnight With Shirtless Putin and Rainbow Dildos”. Domestic intelligence services leaked Trump Kompromat to local protesters? See transcript below.
Perhaps one of the first public indications of President Trump’s Russia problem involved an exclusive May 2017 photo-op in the White House where U.S. media were denied access. The U.K. Guardian then reported how “The White House is facing criticism for a possible security breach after it allowed a Russian news service photographer into the Oval Office to snap photos of Donald Trump and a pair of top Russian officials.”
“Does the Russian government have any compromising material on President Trump or his family?” asked the Associated Press’s Jonathan Lemire during Monday’s presser. “It’s difficult to imagine an utter nonsense of a bigger scale than this. Please, just disregard these issues and don’t think about this again,” responded Russian President Putin in a vaguely mind-controlling sort of way.
Granular analysis of President Trump’s remarks can resequence locally time-reversed grains of speech to synthesize new meaning from digital reflections of the audio soundtrack. A series of NewsInsideOut.com reports (see links below) have described how this approach successfully determined facts of global wars, serial killer identities as well as Russian, Israeli and U.S. intelligence operations days, weeks, months and years before they were accepted as mainstream knowledge.
Below is a partial transcript of the secret messages heard in the video ‘’Sex with Daddy’: Trump Helsinki Secret Messages Revealed” where messages from the July 16, 2018, Russian-United States summit press conference are indicated in bold followed by the context in which they were first discovered.
I need punishing: I think that we will be competing, when you talk about the pipeline. I’m not sure necessarily that it’s in the best interests of Germany or not, but that was a decision that they made. We’ll be competing. As you know, the United States is now (or soon will be) but I think it actually is right now the largest in the oil and gas world. So we’re going to be selling LNG [Liquid Natural Gas] and we’ll have to be competing with the pipeline.
His love: dildos/Sex with daddy: And I think we’ll compete successfully (although there is a little advantage locationally). So I just wish them luck. I did. I discussed with Angela Merkel in pretty strong tones but I also know where they’re all coming from. And they have a very close source. So we’ll see how that all works out. But we have lots of sources now and the United States is much different than it was a number of years ago when we weren’t able to extract what we can extract today. So today we’re number one in the world at that and I think we’ll be out there competing very strong.
Give us yellow lips/Acid vanishes yellow/The dildo with blood on it: Yes I do. I hold both countries responsible. I think that the United States has been foolish. I think we’ve all been foolish. We should have had this dialogue a long time ago. A long time (frankly) before I got to office. And I think we’re all to blame. I think that the United States has now stepped forward along with Russia. And we’re getting together. And we have a chance to do some great things. Whether it’s nuclear proliferation (in terms of stopping). Have to do it. Ultimately that’s probably the most important thing that we can be working on.
Use the blackmail: We won that race and it’s a shame that there could even be a little bit of a cloud over it. People know that. People understand it but the main thing (and we discussed this also) is zero collusion. And it has had a negative impact upon the relationship of the two largest nuclear powers in the world. We have 90 percent of [global] nuclear power between the two countries. It’s ridiculous. It’s ridiculous what’s going on with the probe.
Evil bugs out of my office: And I have to say if they had it it would have been out long ago. And if anybody watched Peter Strzok testify over the last couple of days (and I was in Brussels watching it) it was a disgrace to the FBI. It was a disgrace to our country. And you would say “That was a total witch-hunt.” Thank you very much everybody. Thank you.
The president’s apparent contrition in defending President Putin while denouncing the U.S. intelligence community in Helsinki suggests conscience of guilt seeking public absolution. This punishment motif also aligns with allegations made by porn actress Stormy Daniels who claims she received hush money from former Trump personal attorney Michael Cohen on the eve of the 2016 presidential election in order to silence claims of an affair.
In detailing her encounters with the then-pregnant First Lady’s husband the now-iconic stripper reportedly told CBS 60 Minutes “I was like, ‘turn around, drop ’em.’ So he turned around and pulled his pants down a little– you know had underwear on and stuff and I just gave him a couple swats.”
The sex toy motif arises from the transcript in a way that suggests the president endured a humiliating extortionate review of intimate sexual practices during his private one-on-one meeting with Russian President Putin. Apparently the president has a fetish for sex toys and this indiscretion is known to the Russians.
The incestuous motif appears in a way that amplifies the president’s legacy public remarks. A reporter for Rolling Stone wrote in 2015 how “After I met Ivanka and praised her to her father, he said, “Yeah, she’s really something, and what a beauty, that one. If I weren’t happily married and, ya know, her father . . . ”.
Contextual use of the term “Daddy” after meeting with Russian President Putin invites consideration of one darker possibility, that Donald Trump suffered an incestuous injury as part of his paternal heritage where that unhealed emotional injury presents a vulnerability to psychological manipulation through the influence of a male figure who seeks to dominate.
In Monday’s remarks to the press President Trump stated “They said they think it’s Russia; I have President Putin, he just said it’s not Russia,” according to the U.K. Guardian. “I will say this: I don’t see any reason why it would be. I have great confidence in my intelligence people, but I will tell you that President Putin was extremely strong and powerful [emphasis added] in his denial today.”
President Trump in this way compared the secretive summit to a sexual encounter with President Putin, wherein Putin plays a dominant or “Daddy” role.
The yellow motif appeared as the subject of a 2017 report covering then President-elect Trump’s Pee Tape press conference. At that time this reporter wrote how “Characterization of the president-elect as a urophile invokes notions of sadism and masochism that further public perceptions of seeming Trump weaknesses for public shaming and humiliation, uttering creepy suggestions of incest and chumming with pedophiles on “Sex Slave Island.” Urophilia was a topic discussed in the Steele dossier, a controversial document whose allegations the president-elect responded to in those 2017 remarks.
Acid that vanishes the yellow offers the possibility of mind-control applications involving narcotics such as LSD in obscuring memory, or the sanitization of the scene of a sexual crime (up to and including deaths of some parties involved). Blood offers a classical symbol of mortality, including injury and death. The pairing with a sex toy projects images of sexual injury or death accompanying sexual practices. Apparently these events are known to the Russians.
Blackmail suggests the existence of an extortionate dynamic in which President Trump is the victim and President Putin his oppressor. Monday’s Washington Times reported how House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi “suggested the Kremlin is blackmailing President Trump Monday, suggesting Russia has something against the president as the two world leaders met in Helsinki, Finland.”
Office bugs suggest a Nixonian paranoia in the Trump White House reflecting how the Watergate-shy 37th president surveilled everyone (including himself). In March 2017 President Trump tweeted “Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my “wires tapped” in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!”
Upon considerable review it seems impossible for the above circumstances to arise by accident, where the investigator has a proven track record of identifying Russian operatives on U.S. soil and where previous investigations have exposed the same thematic materials. While studying the president’s 2016 remarks at CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia, this reporter then determined how Trump intended to “Lie for Russia”.
If the above results are to be believed, it appears Russia won the Cold War and that the office of the President of the United States now acts as a default Russian proxy upon the global stage under threat of extortion of its occupant. With these conclusions in mind this reporter foresees how like a rudderless ship the United States will continue to collide with trusting allies on issues of economic unity and global policy until its own population tires of Reality Television politics to elect an entirely authentic, unimpeachable leadership.
Vancouver, BC – Earlier this week NewsInsideOut.com’s Jon Kelly offered his reflections on Monday’s 2018 Russia-United States summit in Helsinki, Finland, from the perspective of a veteran investigative reporter who exposed the name of a Russian “Illegals Program” youth operative nine months before it was published in the Wall Street Journal. Host Lorien Fenton from KCOR’s The Fenton Files explored cognitive recalibration in the digital era with guest Jon Kelly including a rare public examination of nine audio permutations of the 2001 George W. Bush Inaugural Address during the July 9, 2018, broadcast.
In a background to “Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections” published January 6, 2017, by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) the U.S. Intelligence Community cited the Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) “Illegals Program” for their role in reporting to Moscow about the 2008 U.S. presidential election. The most publicly visible of the “Illegals Program” spies is Anna Chapman whose involuntary disclosure identifying youth accomplice Tim Foley was published by this reporter nine months before a story in the Wall Street Journal confirmed that name.
The DNI background stated “Since the Cold War, Russian intelligence efforts related to US elections have primarily focused on foreign intelligence collection. For decades, Russian and Soviet intelligence services have sought to collect insider information from US political parties that could help Russian leaders understand a new US administration’s plans and priorities.”
Topmost in a list of bullet points the document highlighted “The Russian Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) Directorate S (Illegals) officers arrested in the United States in 2010 reported to Moscow about the 2008 election.”
During the Fenton Files interview former CBS Radio feature producer Jon Kelly suggested Cold War legacy dynamics still at play in 2018 citing Russian spies residing in the U.S. as recently as 2010.
“The answer has to be yes,” he affirmed. “The “Illegals Program” story is only eight years old. It’s still part of that dynamic. We can’t ignore that it’s going on.”
Turning to Monday’s 2018 Russia-United States summit the independent clinical analyst reflected “Whatever hopes for diplomacy that we are upholding (where President Trump has a meeting with President Putin) there’s hope for global peace riding on those meetings too.”
However, the veteran investigative reporter cautioned “We can’t ignore the hope for peace, but at the same time let’s not have too rosey-tinted an approach to these questions. Obviously there are spy operations as recent as the 2010 “Illegals Program”.”
Vancouver, BC –Video of retired Canadian diplomat James Bissett’s appearance at the University of Ottawa revealed concerns that imperialist unilateralism through pre-emptive military strikes conducted by NATO on behalf of U.S. interests is fundamental to foreign and defense policy in an era where no visible peace movement stands in protest. The former ambassador to Yugoslavia, Albania and Bulgaria offered personal first-hand testimony of history leading to the Euromaidan protests at an event titled “United Ukraine? The Euromaidan revolution and the Donbas rebellion in domestic and international perspectives” held with support of the university’s Graduate School of Public and International Affairs.
In a taped lecture from early December James Bissett cited the 1992 “Defense Planning Guidance, FY 1994-1999” (aka the “Wolfowitz Doctrine”) as critical in understanding European history since the fall of the Berlin Wall. That document was first authored by Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Paul Wolfowitz and convicted perjurer Scooter Libby then later revised under reported close supervision by convicted war criminal/reported Satanist U.S. Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell.
The retired diplomat emphasized roles played by the breach of NATO’s treaty in Bosnia, U.S. arming of KLA terrorists, historic peacekeeping attempts of Russian President Vladimir Putin and NATO’s new mission as defined by President Bill Clinton, comprised of pre-emptive military strikes and interventions on a march of destruction leading to the front door of nuclear-armed Russia. Such exclusive critical commentary emerges in a time when Western anti-Putin propaganda continues in a seemingly unending crescendo of lies targeting a country whose Emergencies Ministry is responsible for sending a reported nearly 11,000 tons of relief aid to Donetsk and Lugansk since August 11th of this year.
The following is a transcript of former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, Albania and Bulgaria James Bissett’s speech to “United Ukraine? The Euromaidan revolution and the Donbas rebellion in domestic and international perspectives” held at the University of Ottawa December 4, 2014. This transcript has been edited for clarity.
“Thank you very much. I’m really delighted and pleased to be here today.
“I find the situation in Ukraine to be terribly tragic. You can see from the title of my speech today (or my talk) that I hold the U.S.-led NATO powers primarily responsible for what’s happening there. As the lady from Somalia said earlier there’s a pattern here. You’ve seen it not only in Ukraine but you’ve seen it in regime change often by force, if not by force by bribing and providing NGOs with money and so on to support the U.S. cause. Egypt, Iraq, Afghanistan; whose been doing all of the interventions, whose been doing all the bombing?
“It hasn’t been Putin. It hasn’t been Russia. They’re held responsible for that, as was Gaddafi, as was Milosevic, as was a list of “bad guys.” When the U.S. calls you a “bad guy” then you’re a bad guy and out comes the propaganda. The tragedy of Ukraine is that it’s being destroyed. It’s not only Eastern Ukraine that probably will never be able to recover economically. It’s Ukraine itself. The big deal that the European Union offered Ukraine a year ago or so to become an associate member of the European Union, what did it mean?
“It didn’t mean one Euro dollar. It meant some sort of association and friendship. When it was countered by Putin with a $15B deal it’s little wonder that the Ukrainian president bought into that rather than the false promise by the EU.
“I’m finding it really sad and dreadful that Ukrainians were killed in this. It’s a totally unnecessary war. It’s on the hundredth anniversary of the First World War. You would think that we’d learned something from what happened in the first part of the twentieth century: two cataclysmic world wars, millions of people killed. Now we’re not even into fourteen years of the twenty-first century and we’re doing the same thing. It’s really a condemnation of our political leaders.
“What’s happening in Ukraine is what’s happened elsewhere right since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the fall of the Berlin Wall. The Americans, who had a wonderful opportunity of instituting a Pax Americana, where the United States with its life of liberty and pursuit of happiness could finally maybe prevail and they screwed it up. They didn’t do that.
“They didn’t offer Russia (that collapsed) and the other members of the Soviet Union one iota of help. After the Second World War we had the Marshall Plan that brought the Germans back into economic survival, the Japanese were forgiven. And what happened when the Soviet Union collapsed? Nothing. Not an ounce of aid was offered. And in fact what happened was a resurgence of American military power because when the Soviet Union collapsed people began to wonder “Why do we have NATO,” this powerful military machine in the middle of Europe?
“Expensive and totally unnecessary. Who was the enemy? They had to find an enemy.
“George Kennan, who was perhaps the most famous U.S. ambassador in Moscow for years and who was responsible for the containment policy that kept the Communists back, said in 1980, in the middle of the Cold War and I can quote it almost from memory, he wrote that should the Soviet Union drown beneath the waters of the ocean tomorrow, the United States would have to reconstitute it within three or four days, or the whole economy of the United States would collapse.
[Quote: “Were the Soviet Union to sink tomorrow under the waters of the ocean, the American military-industrial establishment would have to go on, substantially unchanged, until some other adversary could be invented. Anything else would be an unacceptable shock to the American economy.”]
“He kept writing until his death that the expansion of NATO eastward was a mistake; any attempt to keep Russia down was a foolish move. That’s of course what happened because when the Soviet Union collapsed NATO had to find a reason for existence and they found it with the breakup of Yugoslavia. I happened to be there. I saw, I witnessed this first-hand.
“Remember, I was an old Cold War warrior. I was proud of NATO. Canada’s foreign minister Louis St. Laurent played a major role in the formation of NATO. When the Europeans were deciding to have a defense pact, he persuaded the Europeans to invite the United States and Canada in the form of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization. This is critically important because Article 1 of the NATO treaty said (and again I can quote it) that NATO will never use or threaten to use force in the resolution of international disputes and will always act in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.
[Article 1: “The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.”]
“It became, in effect, the kind of military arm of the United Nations. That was an obstacle for American aggrandizement. They didn’t like Article 1. Article 1 prevented them from doing what they always wanted to do, having NATO at the forefront of many of their foreign policy objectives so it didn’t look as though America was doing these things. It looked like NATO was doing them.
“They broke Article 1 of the treaty starting in Bosnia where they had the bombing. They decided in Bosnia that they would support the Muslim cause there rather than the Serbian cause. I was there at the time there was a referendum in Bosnia headed by the Muslim leader [Alija Izetbegović, president of Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1990-96)] who had joined up with the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1980s, who was a fundamental Islamist (and he made no bones about it; he’d written a book about it: his “Mein Kampf”). [Possible reference to “Notes from Prison, 1983-1988”]
“He had a referendum. The referendum failed because the Serbian population, the Christian population didn’t vote for it at the time. He then signed an agreement with the Serb leader or the Croatian’s leader in Lisbon in the spring of 1992 that if Bosnia did separate there’d be three autonomous regions. That was signed in Lisbon.
[Source: “The Carrington–Cutileiro peace plan, named for its authors Lord Carrington and Portuguese ambassador José Cutileiro, resulted from the EC Peace Conference held in February 1992 in an attempt to prevent Bosnia-Herzegovina sliding into war. It proposed ethnic power-sharing on all administrative levels and the devolution of central government to local ethnic communities. However, all Bosnia-Herzegovina’s districts would be classified as Muslim, Serb or Croat under the plan, even where no ethnic majority was evident.]
“When he came back to Sarajevo after signing that my neighbor, who lived across the street from me, the U.S. ambassador decided that that was not what the Americans wanted, flew to Sarajevo and said to Izetbegović, “Why did you sign this stupid agreement? Why don’t you simply declare unilateral independence?” And Izetbegović said “If we do, we’ll have a civil war. There’s no way that Christian Serbs are going to live under Muslim rule. Warren Zimmermann, my neighbor, the ambassador said “Declare unilateral independence. We will support you, militarily if necessary.”
“What happened? A civil war; 200,000 people killed. Quite unnecessary but it was done. They later intervened in Kosovo. They decided that because the Europeans, France and Germany were beginning to think of maybe getting out of NATO and forming their own defensive organization the Americans decided we must move eastward. A good chunk of land was Kosovo, where there was trouble in Kosovo between the Albanian minority and the Serbian security forces. I notice one of the points upon this little document that I would challenge, “NATO’s Kosovo Operation: A Valid Excuse” and it says “In Kosovo there was an actual humanitarian crisis.”
“In fact there was no humanitarian crisis. The Americans armed and equipped the Kosovo Liberation Army, sent them back into Kosovo to assassinate Serbian mayors, shoot Serbian policemen, knowing that the Serbs would retaliate (which they did). There was fighting in Kosovo but there was no mass ethnic cleansing. All that took place after the NATO bombing of Kosovo. The U.N. has proven that. [Source: “KLA is still present in the MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base list of terrorist groups, and is listed as an inactive terrorist organisation by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.”]
“Kosovo was important because that’s when the Americans broke the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Article 1. The Americans decided that they would bomb Serbia, a country that had no weapons of mass destruction, was not a threat to anyone except trying to put down an armed rebellion in their own country. And they bombed Serbia for 78 days and 78 nights. They did it in a violation of international law, a violation of Article 1 of the NATO treaty, of the Helsinki Accord and of the United Nations Charter.
“Who warned them not to do this? Putin. Putin warned them not to do this. And when later on, they persuaded the Albanians, after the Serbs had left Albania (ethnically cleansed I might add) they then asked for the Albanians to declare what? Unilateral independence. There was no referendum. They just said “Declare independence. We, the Americans, the United States and our allies and NATO will recognize your independence,“ which they did. Who warned them not to do that? Putin.
“Putin said, “You’re breaking international law. You’re opening a Pandora’s Box here so that any little country or region of a country can declare unilateral independence and you shouldn’t do it. And if you do do it, I’ve got a couple of places where I might want to do it.” He named Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria. That was done in March 1999 during the bombing of Kosovo. All of this I’m leading up to how it relates to Ukraine.
“On NATO’s 50th birthday party held in Washington, Bill Clinton was the guy (and his gang. I met some of them: Madeleine Albright, [United States Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke (2009-10)]. These were not in my opinion good people.)
“On the 50th anniversary of NATO’s birthday party they not only were bombing Serbia. By the way, they dropped cluster bombs on the marketplace in Niš on a Saturday afternoon where little old ladies were out buying their carrots. They couldn’t hit any of the military targets so they did a tremendous bombing campaign that went on for that length of time. People forget that but I don’t forget it because I was around then.
[Source: “On 7 May 1999, between the time of 11:30 and 11:40, a NATO attack was carried out with two containers of cluster bombs directed at Niš Airport, located at the end of the city. The bombs missed their target and fell near the city center. The bombs were scattered from the two containers and were carried by the wind and then fell in three locations in the central part of the city: The Pathology building next to the Medical Center of Niš in the south of the city, next to the building of “Banovina” including the main market, bus station next to the Niš Fortress and “12th February” Health Centre, parking of “Niš Express” near the Nišava River. A report from Human Rights Watch stated that 15 civilians were killed, with another 28 injured.”]
“In addition to that they broke their promise that they had made to Gorbachev [President of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev (1990-91)] that if the Russians allowed a united Germany into NATO that then NATO would not expand eastward. In March 1999 not only did they bomb Serbia but at that 50th birthday party Billy Clinton announced a new role for NATO. That is NATO can now operate out of territory and it can bomb militarily or intervene militarily anywhere and wherever they want to do, with or without U.N. approval.
[Quote: “We’ve also reaffirmed our determination repeatedly to intensify our actions, military and economic, until we achieve our objectives in Kosovo … We cannot expect for people to stop being drawn back to old ways of organizing themselves, even profoundly destructive ways resting on ethnic and religious divisions, unless there is a far more powerful magnate out there before them.”]
“In addition to that, in the same month they let into NATO Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic, breaking the promise to Gorbachev. Since then, as you know, they’ve got Russia completely encircled by the former members of the Soviet Union, none of them friendly with Russia (with good historical reasons) and they’re putting military bases there. The great prize for the Americans of course is Ukraine and it didn’t look as though they were going to get it until the Maidan [Euromaidan protests in Kiev marked by neo-nazi violence and sniper fire leading to overthrow of the democratically government].
“There’s a question about whether they actually instigated the uprising. I don’t think they necessarily did. I think initially it was a fed-up Ukrainian people who saw no hope for their country. They were tired, they were out of work, they moan for their kids and they started protesting and probably rightly so. But at that point the Americans saw an opportunity and stepped in. Victoria Nuland, whose the head of the European division of the State Department [Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs] flew into the Maidan. Senator McCain, the warlord who’ll fight anybody, he flew in there. Even our own foreign minister was there.
“They just used the Ukraine as a pawn. I don’t think they’re going to get away with it because they gave Putin a wonderful opportunity to get the Crimea back (which he did) and Russia is not to be played with militarily; they have the nuclear bomb. I was once in India trying to persuade the Indian government not to recognize Kosovo and complaining bitterly about what happened in Yugoslavia. An Indian military man asked if he could put a question to me and I said “Yes” and he said “There’s a big difference between India and Serbia, ambassador.”
“I said, “What’s that?” He said, “India has the bomb. Serbia does not.” Russia has the bomb. There is no way that Russia can allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO any more than they would allow Georgia to become a member of NATO. This is in their national interest. Certainly the Americans knew what was going to happen when Khrushchev was going to put missiles in Cuba [Former First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Nikita Khrushchev, the 1962 Cuban missile crisis]. Of course they wouldn’t allow it and rightly so.
“The future for Ukraine is not a happy one but it’s a sad and tragic thing that they’re killing each other because they’re simply a pawn in a much bigger game. It’s not going to be [President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko] who decides to stop the fighting. It’s going to be Obama and I’m not sure Obama cares. I’m not sure he even knows where Ukraine is and that’s the problem. Republicans are more war-like than the Democrats so the situation in the future is not a very healthy or happy one.
“What’s the origin of this American passion to rule the world? It starts again in 1992. The U.S. had a defense planning document. It’s a very critical document and it explains a great deal of all the things that will happen since the fall of the Berlin Wall. [Download PDF: “Defense Planning Guidance, FY 1994-1999”]
“I’m going to read a bit of it. It was in 1992. The Defense Planning document envisaged the U.S.A. as the world’s strongman dominating every other country and locking down the Middle East oil supplies for its own use. That was one of its primary objectives. The other objective was to prevent the rise of any global power from dominating a region whose resources would generate a global power to rival the United States. The document refers to the former Soviet Union and the danger that Russia might one day again aspire to challenge U.S. hegemony in Europe and calls for a unilateral U.S. defense guarantee of Eastern Europe in cooperation with other NATO allies.
“The Planning document explains a great deal about what happened since then and they’re not stopping it. Ukraine is simply another example. I think this time they’ve run into something that they’re not going to be able to resolve very easily. But how are we going to stop it? Interestingly enough there’s no peace movement any more in the United States or in Canada or anywhere. It’s a shame. Look at the Vietnam War, the demonstrations, people out on the streets saying “Come on, stop this killing. Let’s get down to talking.” And that’s gone by the board. It’s unfortunate.”