Former Canadian diplomat: NATO US stooge in Ukraine crisis

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC –Video of retired Canadian diplomat James Bissett’s appearance at the University of Ottawa revealed concerns that imperialist  unilateralism through pre-emptive military strikes conducted by NATO on behalf of U.S. interests is fundamental to foreign and defense policy in an era where no visible peace movement stands in protest. The former ambassador to Yugoslavia, Albania and Bulgaria offered personal first-hand testimony of history leading to the Euromaidan protests at an event titled “United Ukraine? The Euromaidan revolution and the Donbas rebellion in domestic and international perspectives” held with support of the university’s Graduate School of Public and International Affairs.

In a taped lecture from early December James Bissett cited the 1992 “Defense Planning Guidance, FY 1994-1999” (aka the “Wolfowitz Doctrine”) as critical in understanding European history since the fall of the Berlin Wall. That document was first authored by Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Paul Wolfowitz and convicted perjurer Scooter Libby then later revised under reported close supervision by convicted war criminal/reported Satanist U.S. Secretary of Defense Dick Cheney and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell.

The retired diplomat emphasized roles played by the breach of NATO’s treaty in Bosnia, U.S. arming of KLA terrorists, historic peacekeeping attempts of Russian President Vladimir Putin and NATO’s new mission as defined by President Bill Clinton, comprised of pre-emptive military strikes and interventions on a march of destruction leading to the front door of nuclear-armed Russia. Such exclusive critical commentary emerges in a time when Western anti-Putin propaganda continues in a seemingly unending crescendo of lies targeting a country whose Emergencies Ministry is responsible for sending a reported nearly 11,000 tons of relief aid to Donetsk and Lugansk since August 11th of this year.

The following is a transcript of former Canadian ambassador to Yugoslavia, Albania and Bulgaria James Bissett’s speech to “United Ukraine? The Euromaidan revolution and the Donbas rebellion in domestic and international perspectives” held at the University of Ottawa December 4, 2014. This transcript has been edited for clarity.

“Thank you very much. I’m really delighted and pleased to be here today.

“I find the situation in Ukraine to be terribly tragic. You can see from the title of my speech today (or my talk) that I hold the U.S.-led NATO powers primarily responsible for what’s happening there. As the lady from Somalia said earlier there’s a pattern here. You’ve seen it not only in Ukraine but you’ve seen it in regime change often by force, if not by force by bribing and providing NGOs with money and so on to support the U.S. cause. Egypt, Iraq, Afghanistan; whose been doing all of the interventions, whose been doing all the bombing?

“It hasn’t been Putin. It hasn’t been Russia. They’re held responsible for that, as was Gaddafi, as was Milosevic, as was a list of “bad guys.” When the U.S. calls you a “bad guy” then you’re a bad guy and out comes the propaganda. The tragedy of Ukraine is that it’s being destroyed. It’s not only Eastern Ukraine that probably will never be able to recover economically. It’s Ukraine itself. The big deal that the European Union offered Ukraine a year ago or so to become an associate member of the European Union, what did it mean?

“It didn’t mean one Euro dollar. It meant some sort of association and friendship. When it was countered by Putin with a $15B deal it’s little wonder that the Ukrainian president bought into that rather than the false promise by the EU.

“I’m finding it really sad and dreadful that Ukrainians were killed in this. It’s a totally unnecessary war. It’s on the hundredth anniversary of the First World War. You would think that we’d learned something from what happened in the first part of the twentieth century: two cataclysmic world wars, millions of people killed. Now we’re not even into fourteen years of the twenty-first century and we’re doing the same thing. It’s really a condemnation of our political leaders.

“What’s happening in Ukraine is what’s happened elsewhere right since the collapse of the Soviet Union and the fall of the Berlin Wall. The Americans, who had a wonderful opportunity of instituting a Pax Americana, where the United States with its life of liberty and pursuit of happiness could finally maybe prevail and they screwed it up. They didn’t do that.

“They didn’t offer Russia (that collapsed) and the other members of the Soviet Union one iota of help. After the Second World War we had the Marshall Plan that brought the Germans back into economic survival, the Japanese were forgiven. And what happened when the Soviet Union collapsed? Nothing. Not an ounce of aid was offered. And in fact what happened was a resurgence of American military power because when the Soviet Union collapsed people began to wonder “Why do we have NATO,” this powerful military machine in the middle of Europe?

“Expensive and totally unnecessary. Who was the enemy? They had to find an enemy.

“George Kennan, who was perhaps the most famous U.S. ambassador in Moscow for years and who was responsible for the containment policy that kept the Communists back, said in 1980, in the middle of the Cold War and I can quote it almost from memory, he wrote that should the Soviet Union drown beneath the waters of the ocean tomorrow, the United States would have to reconstitute it within three or four days, or the whole economy of the United States would collapse.

[Quote: “Were the Soviet Union to sink tomorrow under the waters of the ocean, the American military-industrial establishment would have to go on, substantially unchanged, until some other adversary could be invented. Anything else would be an unacceptable shock to the American economy.”]

“He kept writing until his death that the expansion of NATO eastward was a mistake; any attempt to keep Russia down was a foolish move. That’s of course what happened because when the Soviet Union collapsed NATO had to find a reason for existence and they found it with the breakup of Yugoslavia. I happened to be there. I saw, I witnessed this first-hand.

“Remember, I was an old Cold War warrior. I was proud of NATO. Canada’s foreign minister Louis St. Laurent played a major role in the formation of NATO. When the Europeans were deciding to have a defense pact, he persuaded the Europeans to invite the United States and Canada in the form of a North Atlantic Treaty Organization. This is critically important because Article 1 of the NATO treaty said (and again I can quote it) that NATO will never use or threaten to use force in the resolution of international disputes and will always act in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.

[Article 1: “The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.”]

“It became, in effect, the kind of military arm of the United Nations. That was an obstacle for American aggrandizement. They didn’t like Article 1. Article 1 prevented them from doing what they always wanted to do, having NATO at the forefront of many of their foreign policy objectives so it didn’t look as though America was doing these things. It looked like NATO was doing them.

“They broke Article 1 of the treaty starting in Bosnia where they had the bombing. They decided in Bosnia that they would support the Muslim cause there rather than the Serbian cause. I was there at the time there was a referendum in Bosnia headed by the Muslim leader [Alija Izetbegović, president of Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina (1990-96)] who had joined up with the Muslim Brotherhood in the 1980s, who was a fundamental Islamist (and he made no bones about it; he’d written a book about it: his “Mein Kampf”). [Possible reference to “Notes from Prison, 1983-1988”]

“He had a referendum. The referendum failed because the Serbian population, the Christian population didn’t vote for it at the time. He then signed an agreement with the Serb leader or the Croatian’s leader in Lisbon in the spring of 1992 that if Bosnia did separate there’d be three autonomous regions. That was signed in Lisbon.

[Source: “The Carrington–Cutileiro peace plan, named for its authors Lord Carrington and Portuguese ambassador José Cutileiro, resulted from the EC Peace Conference held in February 1992 in an attempt to prevent Bosnia-Herzegovina sliding into war. It proposed ethnic power-sharing on all administrative levels and the devolution of central government to local ethnic communities. However, all Bosnia-Herzegovina’s districts would be classified as Muslim, Serb or Croat under the plan, even where no ethnic majority was evident.]

“When he came back to Sarajevo after signing that my neighbor, who lived across the street from me, the U.S. ambassador decided that that was not what the Americans wanted, flew to Sarajevo and said to Izetbegović, “Why did you sign this stupid agreement? Why don’t you simply declare unilateral independence?” And Izetbegović said “If we do, we’ll have a civil war. There’s no way that Christian Serbs are going to live under Muslim rule. Warren Zimmermann, my neighbor, the ambassador said “Declare unilateral independence. We will support you, militarily if necessary.”

“What happened? A civil war; 200,000 people killed. Quite unnecessary but it was done. They later intervened in Kosovo. They decided that because the Europeans, France and Germany were beginning to think of maybe getting out of NATO and forming their own defensive organization the Americans decided we must move eastward. A good chunk of land was Kosovo, where there was trouble in Kosovo between the Albanian minority and the Serbian security forces. I notice one of the points upon this little document that I would challenge, “NATO’s Kosovo Operation: A Valid Excuse” and it says “In Kosovo there was an actual humanitarian crisis.”

“In fact there was no humanitarian crisis. The Americans armed and equipped the Kosovo Liberation Army, sent them back into Kosovo to assassinate Serbian mayors, shoot Serbian policemen, knowing that the Serbs would retaliate (which they did). There was fighting in Kosovo but there was no mass ethnic cleansing. All that took place after the NATO bombing of Kosovo. The U.N. has proven that. [Source: “KLA is still present in the MIPT Terrorism Knowledge Base list of terrorist groups, and is listed as an inactive terrorist organisation by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.”]

“Kosovo was important because that’s when the Americans broke the North Atlantic Treaty Organization Article 1. The Americans decided that they would bomb Serbia, a country that had no weapons of mass destruction, was not a threat to anyone except trying to put down an armed rebellion in their own country. And they bombed Serbia for 78 days and 78 nights. They did it in a violation of international law, a violation of Article 1 of the NATO treaty, of the Helsinki Accord and of the United Nations Charter.

“Who warned them not to do this? Putin. Putin warned them not to do this. And when later on, they persuaded the Albanians, after the Serbs had left Albania (ethnically cleansed I might add) they then asked for the Albanians to declare what? Unilateral independence. There was no referendum. They just said “Declare independence. We, the Americans, the United States and our allies and NATO will recognize your independence,“ which they did. Who warned them not to do that? Putin.

“Putin said, “You’re breaking international law. You’re opening a Pandora’s Box here so that any little country or region of a country can declare unilateral independence and you shouldn’t do it. And if you do do it, I’ve got a couple of places where I might want to do it.” He named Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria. That was done in March 1999 during the bombing of Kosovo. All of this I’m leading up to how it relates to Ukraine.

“On NATO’s 50th birthday party held in Washington, Bill Clinton was the guy (and his gang. I met some of them: Madeleine Albright, [United States Special Envoy for Afghanistan and Pakistan Richard Holbrooke (2009-10)]. These were not in my opinion good people.)

“On the 50th anniversary of NATO’s birthday party they not only were bombing Serbia. By the way, they dropped cluster bombs on the marketplace in Niš on a Saturday afternoon where little old ladies were out buying their carrots. They couldn’t hit any of the military targets so they did a tremendous bombing campaign that went on for that length of time. People forget that but I don’t forget it because I was around then.

[Source: “On 7 May 1999, between the time of 11:30 and 11:40, a NATO attack was carried out with two containers of cluster bombs directed at Niš Airport, located at the end of the city. The bombs missed their target and fell near the city center. The bombs were scattered from the two containers and were carried by the wind and then fell in three locations in the central part of the city: The Pathology building next to the Medical Center of Niš in the south of the city, next to the building of “Banovina” including the main market, bus station next to the Niš Fortress and “12th February” Health Centre, parking of “Niš Express” near the Nišava River. A report from Human Rights Watch stated that 15 civilians were killed, with another 28 injured.”]

“In addition to that they broke their promise that they had made to Gorbachev [President of the Soviet Union Mikhail Gorbachev (1990-91)] that if the Russians allowed a united Germany into NATO that then NATO would not expand eastward. In March 1999 not only did they bomb Serbia but at that 50th birthday party Billy Clinton announced a new role for NATO. That is NATO can now operate out of territory and it can bomb militarily or intervene militarily anywhere and wherever they want to do, with or without U.N. approval.

[Quote: “We’ve also reaffirmed our determination repeatedly to intensify our actions, military and economic, until we achieve our objectives in Kosovo … We cannot expect for people to stop being drawn back to old ways of organizing themselves, even profoundly destructive ways resting on ethnic and religious divisions, unless there is a far more powerful magnate out there before them.”]

“In addition to that, in the same month they let into NATO Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic, breaking the promise to Gorbachev. Since then, as you know, they’ve got Russia completely encircled by the former members of the Soviet Union, none of them friendly with Russia (with good historical reasons) and they’re putting military bases there. The great prize for the Americans of course is Ukraine and it didn’t look as though they were going to get it until the Maidan [Euromaidan protests in Kiev marked by neo-nazi violence and sniper fire leading to overthrow of the democratically government].

“There’s a question about whether they actually instigated the uprising. I don’t think they necessarily did. I think initially it was a fed-up Ukrainian people who saw no hope for their country. They were tired, they were out of work, they moan for their kids and they started protesting and probably rightly so. But at that point the Americans saw an opportunity and stepped in. Victoria Nuland, whose the head of the European division of the State Department [Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs] flew into the Maidan. Senator McCain, the warlord who’ll fight anybody, he flew in there. Even our own foreign minister was there.

“They just used the Ukraine as a pawn. I don’t think they’re going to get away with it because they gave Putin a wonderful opportunity to get the Crimea back (which he did) and Russia is not to be played with militarily; they have the nuclear bomb. I was once in India trying to persuade the Indian government not to recognize Kosovo and complaining bitterly about what happened in Yugoslavia. An Indian military man asked if he could put a question to me and I said “Yes” and he said “There’s a big difference between India and Serbia, ambassador.”

“I said, “What’s that?” He said, “India has the bomb. Serbia does not.” Russia has the bomb. There is no way that Russia can allow Ukraine to become a member of NATO any more than they would allow Georgia to become a member of NATO. This is in their national interest. Certainly the Americans knew what was going to happen when Khrushchev was going to put missiles in Cuba [Former First Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union Nikita Khrushchev, the 1962 Cuban missile crisis]. Of course they wouldn’t allow it and rightly so.

“The future for Ukraine is not a happy one but it’s a sad and tragic thing that they’re killing each other because they’re simply a pawn in a much bigger game. It’s not going to be [President of Ukraine Petro Poroshenko] who decides to stop the fighting. It’s going to be Obama and I’m not sure Obama cares. I’m not sure he even knows where Ukraine is and that’s the problem. Republicans are more war-like than the Democrats so the situation in the future is not a very healthy or happy one.

“What’s the origin of this American passion to rule the world? It starts again in 1992. The U.S. had a defense planning document. It’s a very critical document and it explains a great deal of all the things that will happen since the fall of the Berlin Wall. [Download PDF: “Defense Planning Guidance, FY 1994-1999”]

“I’m going to read a bit of it. It was in 1992. The Defense Planning document envisaged the U.S.A. as the world’s strongman dominating every other country and locking down the Middle East oil supplies for its own use. That was one of its primary objectives. The other objective was to prevent the rise of any global power from dominating a region whose resources would generate a global power to rival the United States. The document refers to the former Soviet Union and the danger that Russia might one day again aspire to challenge U.S. hegemony in Europe and calls for a unilateral U.S. defense guarantee of Eastern Europe in cooperation with other NATO allies.

“The Planning document explains a great deal about what happened since then and they’re not stopping it. Ukraine is simply another example. I think this time they’ve run into something that they’re not going to be able to resolve very easily. But how are we going to stop it? Interestingly enough there’s no peace movement any more in the United States or in Canada or anywhere. It’s a shame. Look at the Vietnam War, the demonstrations, people out on the streets saying “Come on, stop this killing. Let’s get down to talking.” And that’s gone by the board. It’s unfortunate.”

Recommended Reading

Maidan Conspiracy Redux: British black ops in Kiev sniper attacks

Cheney’s ‘Kiss of Shame’: A satanic torture conspiracy revealed

CIA Torture: American Heroes or Sadistic Psychopaths? You Decide!

‘Planet Jonestown’ reveals drone warrior’s mind control secrets

MH370: CIA front Inmarsat’s SIGNINT Iran nuclear missile secrets revealed

 

 

Revived CIA Phoenix assassination program reported three years before Snowden’s Intercept: Maidan Conspiracy Redux (British black ops in Kiev sniper attacks)

By Jon Kelly

NewsInsideOut.com

Vancouver, BC – An exclusive video published to YouTube on March 6, 2014, purported to reveal how a raid on Kiev conducted by British covert operatives was instrumental to sniper incidents that killed a reported 94 people during protests leading to the ouster of Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovich. “The Maidan Conspiracy: British black ops raid in Kyiv sniper attacks” formulated this conclusion from digital reflections of a wiretapped telephone call between European policy-makers leaked to the Internet on March 5, 2014.

UPDATE: On January 17, 2017, Edward Snowden’s press The Intercept published an article whose byline stated “Trump to revive the CIA’s Phoenix assassination program.”

The Intercept: "Trump to revive the CIA's Phoenix assassination program."

Our report below discussed this revival (indicated by Secretary Kerry’s secret message) three years earlier, stating how “The secretary invokes a reinvigorated CIA Phoenix Program (1965 – 1972).” Readers can click on the player below to listen to John Kerry’s remarks at Kiev from March 4, 2014, and the secret message “Scary. The phoenix sat up” encrypted therein.

Officers of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) were said to have conducted surveillance against communications between Minister of Foreign Affairs of Estonia Urmas Paet and High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for the European Union, Baroness Ashton of Upholland, PC, during a telephone call that took place on February 26, 2014.

The Guardian had previously stated testimony from medical professionals evaluating the causes of death in Maidan who had found gunshots to the head, heart and lungs of victims provided “incontrovertible evidence that authorities had turned expert marksmen on the opposition protesters.” In sharp contrast, RT reported the Estonian Foreign Ministry had confirmed authenticity of the leaked wiretapped communications, citing the minister’s statement that ““there is now stronger and stronger understanding that behind the snipers, it was not Yanukovich, but it was somebody from the new coalition.””

Results from a previous study utilizing the same technique were confirmed when it was determined a leaked document reportedly drawn from the Edward Snowden archives included images of flying discs evocative of those cited in a 2013 Examiner.com article linking the NSA whistleblower to UFOs. In what became the first in a three-part series of reports the Vancouver UFO Examiner appealed to occurrences of involuntary speech like those known through incidents of sleep-talking and Freudian slips, occurring when “unconscious signals override voluntary control of the speech organs to offer what can be highly-revealing statements of otherwise undisclosed truths.”

Click here to watch “The Maidan Conspiracy: British black ops raid in Kyiv sniper attacks” on YouTube’s SecretMessageTV, hosted by former CBS Radio feature producer, Jon Kelly: “The Maidan Conspiracy points to a raid conducted by British black operatives under orders from Elizabeth Windsor, the reigning British monarch, as instrumental to sniper incidents that killed a reported 94 people during the protests in Kyiv. These protests and the events that surrounded them ultimately led to the ouster of Ukrainian president Viktor Yanukovich and the subsequent occupation of Crimea by Russian forces.”

The following partial transcript offers context from where within the authenticated wiretapped telephone conversation, mirror-encrypted messages were observed along with text of the messages reported in the “Maidan Conspiracy” video.

Minister of Foreign Affairs of Estonia Urmas Paet SBU Wiretap February 26, 2014:

The English did some raid: “That is the main is the main impression from EU’s and also Estonia’s point of view of course. We are ready to put this financial package together, also together with others. This very clear message is needed that it’s not enough that there is change of government but there’s some real reforms, raid [Freudian slip], real, you know, action to increase the level of trust. Otherwise it will end badly.”

This guy love the death head. The spy pulls puzzle with thoughts to shoot: “There’s some integrity problems, Crimea, all this stuff. Regions party was absolutely upset. They say that well, they accept, they accept this that now there will be new government and there will be external elections but there is enormous pressure against the members of parliament. That there are uninvited visitors during the night to party members.”

High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy for the European Union Catherine Ashton SBU Wiretap February 26, 2014:

The English queen. Maidan’s conspiracy. 2/ Cause death Queen. 3/ Death, rape, go deeper this war: “And I said to the opposition leaders shortly to become government “You need to reach out to Maidan; you need to be engaging with them. You also need to get ordinary police officers back on the streets under a new sense of their role so that people safe.” I said to the party of the Regents people “You have to go and lay flowers where the people died. You have to show you understand what you have, what has happened here, that what you’re experiencing is anger.”

The sheep love punishing. 2/ You weave Canada. The shady lockup. 3/ Devil raid. We’ve used Canada in our bogus bug hunt: “I mean, this is what they’ve got to be careful of as well. But they need to demand great change but they’ve got to let the Rada function. If the Rada doesn’t function then they have big chaos. Being an activist and a doctor is very, very important but it means you’re not a politician. And somehow they’ve come to a kind of accommodation for the next few weeks about how the country’s actually going to run. And then we have elections and things can change and I think that would be quite pos … I’m planning to go back early next week, probably on Monday.”

Click here to watch “Jon Kelly: WWIII flashpoint – UK monarchy directed snipers to kill both Kiev police and protesters” on YouTube’s ExopoliticsTV with American author, lawyer, futurist, peace activist, environmental activist, and space activist Alfred Lambremont Webre.

The secret messages of Urmas Paet occur in tandem with a Freudian slip in which the Estonian minister utters the term “raid” by accident during his spoken remarks. The accompanying unconscious reflection indicates concerns about a raid of English origins and its influence upon events in Kiev which, up until the time of that telephone call, remain unresolved within his mind.

The second of the Urmas Paet secret messages cites his knowledge of a covert operative affiliated with death head symbolism involved with the orchestration of the enigmatic shooting of police and protestors. The meaning of this message is amplified through a related study of the secret messages of current United States Secretary of State John Kerry, featured later in this article.

The secret messages of Catherine Ashton go further into perceptions of a command structure orchestrating events of the Kiev protests from behind the scenes. Elizabeth Windsor, the current reigning British monarch, is cited as a conspirator whose orders are unconsciously implicated as a cause of death of protestors and police along with an involuntary invocation to a deeper conflict with anticipated outcomes to include further casualties and victims of abuses.

The second of the EU foreign policy chief’s messages invokes a sheeple meme common to the vernacular of the New World Order-cautious, suggesting her concern that those who refuse to engage their minds with the issues of the day are subject to punitive mind-control influences of those who would seize leadership by force, coercion or other means.

Baroness Ashton’s appeal to anger within her conscious remarks is echoed in the “livid spear” message of United States Secretary of State John Kerry (see below).

Of great national concern are suggestions of federally-sanctioned black site secret prisons and their implications of torture operating on Canadian soil inferred by her unconscious utterance of the term “shady lock up.” In a report dated September 7, 2006, the BBC reported how US President George W. Bush admitted the CIA was operating such secret prisons and a report from RT published on June 24, 2011, outlined the British government’s role in aiding illegal renditions (state-sponsored kidnappings), stating how “The UK failed to track detainees handed over to the US, neglecting to protect them from possible torture in America’s secret prisons.”

The last of the Ashton messages offers a third use of the term “raid” while emphasizing how Canada has been exploited as part of some unspecified fraudulent surveillance-oriented security exercise.

According to the Examiner, a Mineta standard requires three recurring incidents of any event to invoke notions of planned intelligent actions. That both policy-makers in the wiretapped telephone call are able to give utterance to the term “raid” via both Freudian and mirror encoding suggests wide-spread knowledge within the diplomatic and policy-making community that such an action took place during the events at Maidan.

Secretary Kerry’s unconscious remarks (see below) appear to further amplify this sentiment.

“Well, when that third one went into the Pentagon, it’s like anything else. If you see one of something it’s an accident. When you see two of the same thing, it’s a pattern or a trend. But when you three — see three of the same thing occurring, then you know it’s a program or a plan,” said former United States Secretary of Transportation and Presidential Medal of Freedom recipient Norman Mineta during a reported interview with MSNBC.

In a study leading up to the production of the “Maidan Conspiracy” video, this reporter had been actively following the public appearances of United States Secretary of State John Kerry including last Sunday’s interview on “Meet the Press” along with his historic press conference from Kiev this past Tuesday.

While audio for the following related research materials is not included with the “Maidan Conspiracy” video, readers who wish to conduct their own parallel investigations can download the free WavePad Audio Editor from online publisher NCH, sample the audio from the sources listed below and utilize WavePad’s built-in digital mirror reverse effect.

The following partial transcript offers context from where within the March 2, 2014, interview with Secretary of State John Kerry on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” mirror-encrypted messages were observed along with the text of the messages. Click here to access the audio source for this interview.

Secretary of State John Kerry on Meet the Press March 2, 2014:

The evil wind. 2/ See the kill. Big raid: “Well, NATO is meeting today. The North Atlantic Council is meeting probably even as we speak now. I know that the secretary general of NATO Rasmussen issued a statement, a very strong statement against what has happened. But I don’t know what is actually on the table with respect to the steps they may or may not take. But they’re deeply concerned. Today or tomorrow, the European Foreign Affairs Council will meet. They are very concerned about what has happened. We talked yesterday with Japan, with others. This is a global concern. Because in the 21st century, countries have been working to establish a different kind of behavior as the norm.”

The British knew. 2/ Their queen made a livid spear: “So Russia and President Putin are aligning themselves firmly with this kleptocracy. They’re aligning themselves with the person who was legitimately stripped of his power by the parliament, even by his own supporters. I think this is an enormous mistake for Russia. And we hope, President Obama hopes that President Putin will turn in the direction that is available to him to work with all of us in a way that creates stability in Ukraine. This does not have to be, and should not be, an East/West struggle. This is not about Russia and the U.S. This is about the people of Ukraine. And that’s who needs to be front and center.”

Sad. I’m naked. I can’t see: “Well, he’s finding out the opposite. Let me make it clear. President Putin is not operating from a place of strength here. Yanukovych was his supported president. Yanukovych was thrown out despite Putin’s support. Yanukovych turned on his own people. President Putin is using force in a completely inappropriate manner that will invite the opprobrium of the world. And it already is. He is not going to gain by this.”

The secretary’s secret messages invoke the windy rhetoric of war propaganda, while reinforcing the notion of wide-spread cognition within the diplomatic and policy-making community concerning a raid connected to the Maidan sniper deaths. While citing such an understanding, secretary Kerry points unconsciously to the British queen and her livid spear in a reflection of Baroness Ashton’s appeal to anger transcribed above.

The final message is initiatory in that it embodies the experience of a naked, blindfolded John Kerry during a Skull and Bones secret society ceremony described by author and researcher Texe Marrs who claims that in May, 1966, “John Kerry lay nude in a coffin and bowed before the throne as fellow bonesmen, in strange garb and mouthing mysterious epithets, gathered about him.”

The author elaborates further how during such an event, “The gaunt, naked initiate, John Kerry, was lifted out of the coffin and his blindfold removed. As he blinked his eyes and gazed about the room, he was shocked at the scene. He saw before him members in skeleton suits, in red suits, in bloody, torn, scroungy garb, and in ghostly costumes.”

Initiatory themes within the secret messages of secretary Kerry continue when just days later, he offers his remarks during a press conference held in Kiev, Ukraine.

The following partial transcript offers context from where within the historic March 4, 2014, Kiev press conference of United States Secretary of State John Kerry, mirror-encrypted messages were observed along with the text of the messages. Click here to access the audio source for this press conference.

Secretary of State John Kerry Press Conference in Kiev, Ukraine, March 4, 2014:

Scary. The phoenix sat up: “It was very moving and it gave me a deep personal sense of how closely linked the people of Ukraine are to not just Americans but to people all across the world who today are asking for their rights; asking for the privilege to be able to live, defining their own nation, defining their futures. That’s what this is about.”

Spy for the spooks: “Russia, if it wanted to help de-escalate this situation, could return its troops to the barracks, live by the 1997 base agreement, and de-escalate rather than expand their invasion. Now, we would prefer that. I come here today at the instruction of President Obama to make it absolutely clear; the United States of America would prefer to see this de-escalated.”

Hide Nazi coffin: “The fact is that we believe that there are a set of options available to Russia and to all of us that could move us down a road of appropriate diplomacy, appropriate diplomatic engagement. We invite Russia to come to that table. We particularly invite Russia to engage directly with the government of Ukraine because I am confident they are prepared to help work through these issues in a thoughtful way.”

The saucers that raid our own people. Grey will reign. They’re alien: “It is not appropriate to invade a country and at the end of a barrel of a gun dictate what you are trying to achieve. That is not 21st century G8 major nation behavior. And what we are looking for here is a responsible way to meet the needs of the parties but respect the integrity, the sovereignty, the territorial integrity of Ukraine.”

The initiatory themes invoked during “Meet the Press” continue in Kiev, with an Osiris-like archetype reborn from its own ashes in the form of the phoenix. As a citation from his own Vietnam War experience, it can also be said that in the face of revolution against the elected government of the Ukraine, the secretary invokes a reinvigorated CIA Phoenix Program (1965 – 1972), which according an online CIA retrospective, sought destruction of the political infrastructure of targeted nations.

“The Phoenix program is arguably the most misunderstood and controversial program undertaken by the governments of the United States and South Vietnam during the Vietnam War. It was, quite simply, a set of programs that sought to attack and destroy the political infrastructure of the Lao Dong Party (hereafter referred to as the Viet Cong infrastructure or VCI) in South Vietnam.”

Within the initiatory context, bonesman Kerry volunteers how while operating openly in the capacity of United States Secretary of State, he also continues to serve as a covert operative of his secret spook brethren’s initiatives, which according to British American economist and historian Antony C. Sutton, have previously included Wall Street support for both Bolshevik and National Socialist governments in 20th century Russia and Germany.

The final message offers exopolitical insight and was only available on the now defunct conference live stream. In his response to a question from NBC News correspondent (and wife of former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan) Andrea Mitchell, the secretary invokes visions of America’s secret space program and its not-so-secret reported liaisons with Grey extraterrestrials engaged in abduction scenarios as perhaps the penultimate arbitrators of human events on the ground.

Amidst what is being described as the most serious east-west confrontation since the end of the Cold War, “The Maidan Conspiracy” video relies upon observations utilizing applied phenomena of reflection by mirroring audio from the wiretapped recording across the soundtrack’s timeline.

Specular reflections of sunlight from water on the Earth’s surface predate the first appearance of life on this planet, with scientists claiming evidence for liquid water at or near the planet’s surface 4.3 billion years ago. The Smithsonian Institution’s Department of Paleobiology suggests how the oldest evidence for life “may be 3.5-billion-year-old sedimentary structures.”

The Greek mathematician and engineer Hero of Alexandria (c. 10 – 70 AD) wrote about the nature of reflection and mirrors in his Catoptrica. Considered the “greatest experimentalist of antiquity,” Hero was reportedly the first to discover phenomena of specular reflection, the mirroring of physical waves from a surface (such as a stationary body of water), in which “light from a single incoming direction (a ray) is reflected into a single outgoing direction. “

In the late 17th century, English physicist and mathematician Isaac Newton employed metal alloy mirrors in a reflector telescope through which he resolved the phases of Venus and the moons of Jupiter. These speculum metal mirrors reportedly possessed 66 percent reflectivity while absorbing 34 percent of the incoming signal.

In spite of such a substantial rate of loss, Isaac Newton was successful in resolving scientific phenomena over great distances across space. The influence of his innovative approach to discovery can be found in the largest research-grade land and space-based telescopes of modern times, nearly all of which are described as reflectors.

In the late 20th century, scientists using lossless digital mirrors reflected recordings of sound waves from human speech recordings to determine their intelligibility under conditions of high distortion. Their conclusions, published in the journal Nature, found that speech intelligibility is “resistant to time reversal of local segments of a spoken sentence.”

One of the study’s co-authors, (now Professor & Associate Dean for Research and Graduate Studies at the UC Irvine School of Social Sciences) Kourosh Saberi, would further suggest that “Speech is a multidimensional stimulus. There are different ways you can extract a message from it.”

And that is how a leaked wiretap implicated British black ops in the Kiev sniper attacks of the “Maidan Conspiracy.” Click here to listen to former CBS Radio feature producer Jon Kelly discuss “The Maidan Conspiracy” in the archive from Friday, March 7, 2014 on KTKK AM630’s “The Fringe Radio Show.”

[This article originally appeared in the Vancouver UFO Examiner for March 7, 2014]

Recommended Reading

Cheney’s ‘Kiss of Shame’: A satanic torture conspiracy revealed

MH370: CIA front Inmarsat’s SIGNINT Iran nuclear missile secrets revealed

Bill Cosby’s secret messages disclosed MKULTRA ‘Rape Demon’ redux

Edward Snowden’s UFOs Part 1: NSA PRISM mined UFO data

‘Planet Jonestown’ reveals drone warrior’s mind control secrets