By Jon Kelly
Vancouver, BC – A video posted to YouTube on January 28, 2014, exposed an involuntary process of deep disclosure taking place during former CIA employee and NSA contractor Edward Snowden
Clinical and Educational Consulting with Jon Kelly Call Toll-Free: 1 888 453 0751
Wouldn’t it make more sense that ETs residing long-term on this planet would have human-type blood coursing through their veins? That would be much more conducive to thriving in this environment.
Insect, invertebrate and non-mammalian vertebrate populations do not require human-like blood in order to succeed here 🙂
Oh yeah. Good point. 🙂
These are nonsensical statements. Reverse speech is highly abstract and the speaker is not necessarily consciously aware of the information. It’s useless as an intelligence tool without independent confirmation. And people often mishear the words even when something coherent is being said.
That my findings published over @20 years are accompanied by substantial confirmation is a matter of public record. Some of your arguments may be valid in the abstract. However, in my application mental health professionals who have evaluated the practice that I perform attest to its validity. A suggestion is one could easily replicate my public track record then present a simpler hypothesis to explain the facts. Here’s one example: A 2011 Russian Spies report beat the Wall Street Journal in naming accomplice “Tim” Foley in November 2011. WSJ report didn’t appear until July 2012. WSJ relied upon anonymous U.S. officials as sources. My source was the sleep talking-like comments of Anna Chapman resolved in a digital mirror. See: https://newsinsideout.com/2015/01/anna-chapmans-secret-messages-named-youth-accomplice-anticipated-handlers-betrayal/ The Intercept (the Snowden repository) published a story that supported my findings of a revived CIA Phoenix program three years after mine first appeared. See: https://newsinsideout.com/2014/12/maidan-conspiracy-redux-british-black-ops-kiev-sniper-attacks/ CBS Television news understood the nature of my practical track record as early as 2006 when they studied my work on camera for several hours in closed-door interviews. What I am offering here appear to be statements of fact, not untested hypotheses. What do you think?